SWATANTER KUMAR, B.S.CHAUHAN
Ramlila Maidan Incident – Appellant
Versus
Home Secretary, Union of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Swatanter Kumar, J.
1. At the very outset, I would prefer to examine the principles of law that can render assistance in weighing the merit or otherwise of the contentious disputations asserted before the Court by the parties in the present suo moto petition. Besides restating the law governing Articles 19(1)(a) and 19(1)(b) of the Constitution of India and the parallel restrictions contemplated under Articles 19(2) and 19(3) respectively, I would also gauge the dimensions of legal provisions in relation to the exercise of jurisdiction by the empowered officer in passing an order under Section 144 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short ‘Cr.P.C.’).
2. It appears justified here to mention the First Amendment to the United States (US) Constitution, a bellwether in the pursuit of expanding the horizon of civil liberties. This Amendment provides for the freedom of speech of press in the American Bill of Rights. This Amendment added new dimensions to this right to freedom and purportedly, without any limitations. The expressions used in wording the Amendment have a wide magnitude and are capable of liberal construction. It reads as under : “Congress shall make no law
Babulal Parate v. State of Maharashtra [(1961) 3 SCR 423]}
State of West Bengal Vs. Subodh Gopal Bose [AIR 1954 SC 92]}
Maneka Gandhi v. UOI [AIR 1978 SC 597]
Madhav Hayawadanrao Hoskot v. State of Maharashtra (1978) 3 SCC 544
S. Rangarajan v. Jagjivan Ram [(1989) 2 SCC 574]
State of Madras v. V.G. Row [AIR 1952 SC 196]
Chintamanrao & Anr. v. State of Madhya Pradesh (AIR 1951 SC 118)]
State of Gujarat v. Mirzapur Moti Kureshi Kassab Jamat and Others [(2005) 8 SCC 534]
Romesh Thappar v. State of Madras, [1950 SCR 594]
Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia v. State of Bihar [AIR 1966 SC 740]
Dr. D.C. Saxena v. Hon’ble the Chief Justice of India [(1996) 5 SCC 216]
Union of India v. Naveen Jindal and Anr. [(2004) 2 SCC 510]
Madhu Limaye v. Sub Divisional Magistrate and Ors. [AIR 1971 SC 2481]
Himat Lal K. Shah v. Commissioner of Police, Ahmedabad & Anr. [(1973) 1 SCC 227]
State of Karnataka v. Dr. Praveen Bhai Thogadia, [(2004) 4 SCC 684]
S. Pratap Singh v. The State of Punjab [(1964) 4 SCR 733]
Gulam Abbas v. State of Uttar Pradesh [AIR 1981 SC 2198]
Amitabh Bachchan Corpn. Ltd. v. Mahila Jagran Manch & Ors. [(1997) 7 SCC 91]
R.K. Garg v. Superintendent, District Jail, Saharanpur & Ors. [(1970) 3 SCC 227]
Union of India v. Association of Democratic Reforms [(2002) 3 SCC 696]
Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay v. Shri Laxman Iyer & Anr. [AIR 2003 SC 4182]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.