SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

BELA M.TRIVEDI, A.C.RAO
Anil Surendrasingh Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant No.1:Mr. Radhesh Y Vyas (7060), Advocate
For the Respondent No.1: Mr. Himanshu K. Patel, APP

JUDGMENT (CAV)

Bela M. Trivedi, J.—Both the proceedings arise out of the self-same judgement and order dated 31.7.2019 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge and Special Judge (POCSO), Surat (hereinafter referred to as “the Special Court”) in Special POCSO Case No.223 of 2018, whereby the Special Court has convicted the appellant – accused for the offence under Sections 302, 363, 366, 376AB, 377 and 201 of IPC and under Sections 3(a), 4, 5(a), 5(r) and 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (hereinafter referred to as “the POCSO Act”), and has sentenced him to death penalty for the offence under Sections 302, 376AB of IPC and has awarded different punishments of different durations and directed to make payment of fine for the said offences. The Special Court has acquitted the accused for the offences under the Atrocities Act. The Special Court has not imposed separate punishment for the offence under Sections 3, 4, 5(a), 5(r) and 6 in view of Section 42 of POCSO Act. The appellant – accused has preferred the appeal under Section 374 of Cr.P.C., again

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top