PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Pankaj Jain and Ajay Tewari, JJ.
Bhupender Singh and Ors. – Appellants
Versus
Narcotic Control Bureau and Ors. – Respondents
CRM-3773-2019 in CRA-D-198-DB-2017, CRM-34648-2019 in CRA-D-1013-DB-2017, CRM-40754-2019 in CRA-D-956-DB-2016, CRM-8746-2020 in CRA-D-1162-DB-2017, CRM-1065-2021 in CRA-D-1480-DB-2013, CRM-1672-2021 in CRA-D-706-DB-2017, CRM-1739-2021 in CRA-D-173-DB-2015, CRM-21823-2021 in CRA-D-216-DB-2018, CRM-22307-2021 in CRA-D-421-DB-2018, CRM-22639-2021 in CRA-D-550-DB-2013, CRM-22787-2021 in CRA-D-1646-DB-2015, CRM-23396-2021 in CRA-D-89-DB-2015, CRM-24183-2021 in CRA-D-166-2021, CRM-17422-2021 in CRA-D-14-2019, CRM-24715-2021 in CRA-D-658-DB-2017, CRM-7105-2018 in CRA-D-427-DB-2016, CRM-4752-2020 in CRA-D-410-DB-2016, CRM-16534-2019 and CRM-39920-2018 in CRA-D-718-DB-2015, CRM-9306-2020 in CRA-D-384-2019, CRM-28686-2021 in CRA-D-101-2020, CRM-7811-2021 in CRA-D-156-2020, CRM-31157-2021 in CRA-D-65-DB-2018, CRM-33304-2021 in CRA-D-500-2021, CRM-11644-2019 in CRA-D-561-DB-2016, CRM-35274-2021 in CRA-D-61-2021, CRM-22916-2021 in CRA-D-163-DB-2015, CRM-34571 & 34599-2019 in CRA-D-68-DB-2015
Decided on : 12.1.2022
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 – Section 37 – Suspension of sentence and grant of bail – A person who had undergone five years of pre-convict custody is entitled to be released on bail, on touchstone of Article 21 of Constitution of India – It will also not be inappropriate if similar principles are followed with some variations and modifications in cases relating to convicts who are languishing in jails for reasons that their appeals are not likely to be heard for a considerable period – Where convict/accused is not able to bring his case within parameters of Article 21 of Constitution of India stringent provisions of Section 37 of Act have to be applied – Those cases where claim for suspension of sentence is made out on the basis of long custody would be disposed of by present order while those where claim is not supported by long custody would be segregated and listed for hearing individually. (Paras 27, 41 and 42)
Per Pankaj Jain, J. (Concurring View)
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 – Section 37 – Suspension of sentence and grant of bail – There are more than 16,000 convicts under NDPS and majority of them in State of Punjab – This makes out a case for State to look beyond deterrent measure in form of NDPS Act and evolve reformative measures as well – It is a welfare State and has a role bigger than mere policing – State of Punjab apart from registering cases, needs to wake up to challenge – Malady has gripped society – It cannot afford to be in a state of inertia – This Court is sure that there must be some individual efforts being made by public spirited citizens on the issue of drugs, but menace by now is beyond individual efforts – These efforts need to be integrated to respond to this ailment – It is for State to shoulder responsibility to catalyze such response – Time has come for society and State to look upstream – Directions issued. (Paras 1, 3 to 6)
Result: Reference answered.
JUDGMENT
Ajay Tewari, J.—The issue at hand is the consideration for suspension of sentence in cases under the Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’). Section 37 of the Act is reproduced herein below:-
“37. Offences to be cognizable and non-bailable-
(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974)
(a) every offence punishable under this Act shall be cognizable;
(b) no person accused of an offence punishable for [offences under section 19 or section 24 or section 27A and also for offences involving commercial quantity] shall be released on bail or on his own bond unless-
(i) the Public Prosecutor has been given an opportunity to oppose the application for such release, and
(ii) where the Public Prosecutor opposes the application, the court is satisfied that there are reasonable grounds for believing that he is not guilty of such offence and that he is not likely to commit any offence while on bail.
(2) The limitations on granting of bail specified in clause (b) of sub-section (1) are in addition to the limitations under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974) or any other law for the time being in force, on granting of bail.”
2. It must, however, be noted that the preceding Section 36 of the Act sets the tone as follows:-
“36. Constitution of Special Courts —
(1) The Government may, for the purpose of providing speedy trial of the offences under this Act, by notification in the Official Gazette, constitute as many Special Courts as may be necessary for such area or areas as may be specified in the notification.
(2) A Special Court shall consist of a single Judge who shall be appointed by the Government with the concurrence of the Chief Justice of the High Court. Explanation: In this sub-section, High Court means the High Court of the State in which the Sessions Judge or the Additional Sessions Judge of a Special Court was working immediately before his appointment as such Judge.
(3) A person shall not be qualified for appointment as a Judge of a Special Court unless he is, immediately before such appointment, a Sessions Judge or an Additional Sessions Judge.”
3. One essential factual aspect which has to be noticed is the numerical data relating to the disposal and pendency of appeals under the Act. This Bench vide order dated 05.10.2021 directed the registry to provide year wise details of the pending appeals under the Act. The following information has been provided by the Registry in tabular form:-
| Year wise disposal of NDPS cases (CRA-D) | ||||
| Year | Dismissed | Allowed | Disposed of (Decided with some direction) | Total |
| 2013 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 8 |
| 2014 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 8 |
| 2015 | 7 | 0 |
| 12 |
| 2016 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 10 |
| 2017 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 12 |
| 2018 | 0 | 15 | 2 | 17 |
| 2019 | 29 | 10 | 3 | 42 |
| 2020 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| 2021 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 14 |
| Total | 65 | 33 | 31 | 129 |
| Year wise disposal of NDPS cases (CRA-S) | ||||
| Year | Dismissed | Allowed | Disposed of (Decided with (Decided with some direction) | Total |
| 2013 | 118 | 109 | 102 | 329 |
| 2014 | 116 | 65 | 119 | 300 |
| 2015 | 165 | 84 | 131 | 380 |
| 2016 | 71 | 99 | 44 | 214 |
| 2017 | 44 | 103 | 85 | 232 |
| 2018 | 64 | 66 | 76 | 206 |
| 2019 | 47 | 43 | 65 | 155 |
| 2020 | 36 | 22 | 24 | 82 |
| 2021 | 10 | 3 | 14 | 27 |
| Total | 671 | 594 | 660 | 1925 |
| Computer Generated Report Year Wise Count of Pending NDPS Division Bench Criminal Appeals From Year 2013 Onwards | ||||
| Sr. No. | Case Year | Count |
| 1. | 2013 | 57 |
| 2. | 2014 | 89 |
| 3. | 2015 | 171 |
| 4. | 2016 | 155 |
| 5. | 2017 | 172 |
| 6. | 2018 | 152 |
| 7. | 2019 | 116 |
| 8. | 2020 | 60 |
| 9. | 2021 | 108 |
|
| Total | 1080 |
| Computer Generated Report Year Wise Count of Pending NDPS Single Bench Criminal Appeals From Year 2013 Onwards | ||
Supreme Court Legal Aid Committee Representing Undertrial Prisoners v. Union of India
P. Ramachandra Rao v. State of Karnataka
Surinder Singh @ Shingara Singh v. State of Punjab
Mayuresh Nandkumar Purohit v. Kaushik Manna and another
Tofan Singh v. State of Tamil Nadu
Union of India v. Mahaboob Alam
Ratan Kumar Vishwas v. State of U.P. and Another
Union of India v. Rattan Mallik @ Habul
State of Kerala etc. v. Rajesh etc.
State (GNCT of Delhi) Narcotics Control Bureau v. Lokesh Chadha
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.