Sunil vs State

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

SWARANA KANTA SHARMA
Sunil – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent

Table of Content
1. details of the appeal and original conviction. (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments regarding evidence of dacoity. (Para 3 , 4)
3. concerns on lack of effective legal aid. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 18 , 19 , 20)
4. right to a fair trial and cross-examination. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 21)
5. conclusion on acquittal due to trial deficiencies. (Para 22 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28)

JUDGMENT

Swarana Kanta Sharma, J.

1. The present appeal has been filed by appellant under Section 374 read with Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ("Cr.P.C.") seeking setting aside of the impugned judgment dated 19.03.2009 and order on sentence dated 30.03.2009 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-01, South, Patiala House Court, New Delhi in the Sessions Case No. 124/07 vide which the appellant has been convicted for the offences punishable under Section 399/402 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 ("IPC") and Section 25 of Arms Act, 1959.

2. The facts upon which the present FIR was registered are that on 11.07.2007, Sub Inspector K.C. Kaushik alongwith other staff consisting of Head Constable Pritam Singh, Constable Ram Saran and Constable Maz Ahmed were on petrolling duty and later

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

SWARANA KANTA SHARMASunil – AppellantVersusState – Respondent

SWARANA KANTA SHARMA
Sunil – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent