SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

VIVEK KUMAR BIRLA, VIKAS BUDHWAR
State of U. P. – Appellant
Versus
Mahfooz Ansari – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant: G.A.
For the Respondents:Sadaful Islam Jafri and Sadaful Islam Jafri, Advocates

JUDGMENT

Vikas Budhwar, J.—The present appeal purports to be under Section 378(3) of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (in short ‘Cr.P.C.’), seeking to challenge the judgment and order dated 2.4.2019 passed by IVth Additional District & Sessions Judge/Special Judge, E.C. Act, Pilibhit in S.T. No.297 of 2014, (State of U.P. Vs. Mahfooz Ansari and 4 others), S.T. No.16 of 2015 (State of U.P. Vs. Irshad) and S.T. No.96 of 2015, (State of U.P. Vs. Kalloo Mewati), in Case Crime No.801 of 2014, P.S. Sungarhi, District Pilibhit under Sections 148, 364, 342, 302 read with Sections 149, 201 IPC acquitting the accused respondents, who are 7 in number.

Introductory Facts

2. Essence of the fact which lies in narrow compass as wrapped in prosecution story are that one Jai Prakash s/o Shri Ram Charan Lal r/o Village Gauneri Dan, P.S. Jahanabad, District Pilibhit submitted a written report before Deputy Inspector General of Police Bareilly on 19.5.2004 at 16.30 a.m. with an allegation that he solemnized marriage with Smt. Tabbasum @ Munni d/o Mahmood, r/o Chiriyadeh, P.S. Sungarhi, District P

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top