VIVEK KUMAR BIRLA, VIKAS BUDHWAR
State of U. P. – Appellant
Versus
Mahfooz Ansari – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Vikas Budhwar, J.
1. The present appeal purports to be under Section 378(3) of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (in short 'Cr.P.C.'), seeking to challenge the judgment and order dated 2.4.2019 passed by IVth Additional District & Sessions Judge/Special Judge, E.C. Act, Pilibhit in S.T. No.297 of 2014, (State of U.P. Vs. Mahfooz Ansari and 4 others), S.T. No.16 of 2015 (State of U.P. Vs. Irshad) and S.T. No.96 of 2015, (State of U.P. Vs. Kalloo Mewati), in Case Crime No.801 of 2014, P.S. Sungarhi, District Pilibhit under Sections 148, 364, 342, 302 read with Sections 149, 201 IPC acquitting the accused respondents, who are 7 in number.
INTRODUCTORY FACTS
2. Essence of the fact which lies in narrow compass as wrapped in prosecution story are that one Jai Prakash S/o Shri Ram Charan Lal R/o Village Gauneri Dan, P.S. Jahanabad, District Pilibhit submitted a written report before Deputy Inspector General of Police Bareilly on 19.5.2004 at 16.30 a.m. with an allegation that he solemnized marriage with Smt. Tabbasum @ Munni D/o Mahmood, R/o Chiriyadeh, P.S. Sungarhi, District Pili
Rajesh Prasad Vs. State of Bihar
Apren Joseph Alias Current Kunjukunju and others Vs. The State of Kerala
Tara Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab
P. Rajagopal and others Vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Dharam Deo Yadav Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh
Dhan Raj @ Dhand Vs. State of Haryana
Chandrapal Vs. State of Chhattisgarh
Arjun Panditrao Khotkar Vs. Kailash Kushanrao Gorantyal and others
Nathiya Vs. State represented by Inspector of Police, Bagayam Police Station Vellore
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.