Mohammad Naseem VS State of Telangana

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY
Mohammad Naseem – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent

Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioners:Nageshwar Rao Pujari, Advocate
For the Respondents: Public Prosecutor

ORDER (COMMON)

All the above Criminal Petitions are filed to quash the proceedings against the petitioners-accused in respective Crimes/Calendar Cases/Preliminary Register Cases (P.R.Cs)/ Sessions Cases. The details of the relevant Crimes/C.Cs/ S.Cs/P.R.Cs, offences alleged etc., are mentioned in the following tabular form:—

Crime Cases
Sl. No.	Criminal Petition No	Crime No	Accused Number	Offences allegedly committed
1.	5073 of 2023	431/2023 of Banjara Hills Police Station, Hyderabad	A3	370, 370 (A)(2) I.P.C. and Sections 3, 4, 5 of Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 (for short, ‘the Act, 1956’)
2.	6183 of 2023	429/2023 on the file of Raidurgam Police Station, Cyberabad	A3	370, 370 (A) I.P.C. and Sections 3, 4, 5 of PITA Act
3.	7164 of 2023	443 of 2021 on the file of Vanastha - lipuram Police Station, Rachakonda	A5	370 (A)(2) I.P.C. and Sections 3, 4, 5 and 7 of PITA Act
Calendar Case
4.	6952 of 2023	C.C.No.388 of 2023 on the file of I Additional Junior Civil Judge-cum- XII Additional Metropolitan Magi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHYMohammad Naseem – AppellantVersusState of Telangana – Respondent

G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY
Mohammad Naseem – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent