SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, NAVNEET KUMAR
Rupak Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The instant application has been filed under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure assailing the order dated 18.04.2022 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Dumka in connection with Sessions Trial No. 163 of 2019 arising out of Shikaripara P.S. Case No. 45 of 2014, whereby and whereunder, the petition filed under Section 227 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for discharge of the petitioners from the criminal liability has been rejected by holding therein that there is ground for presuming that both the petitioners have committed offences punishable under Sections 4,5 and Section 6 of the Explosive Substances Act.
2. The aforesaid case was listed before the learned single Judge of this Court but later on vide order dated 19.05.2023 the learned Single Judge in the light of judgment as rendered by the Full Bench of this Court in the case of Rakesh Saw @ Sahu Vs. State of Jharkhand reported in 2023(1) JBCJ 88(F.B), had directed the office to place this matter before the division bench with the permission of Hon’ble the Chief Justice and accordingly, the instant case has been assigned to this bench.
3. Although the case has been filed
Rajiv Thapar and Ors. vs. Madan Lal Kapoor
State of Orissa vs. Debendra Nath Padhi
Union of India vs. Prafulla Kumar Samal and Anr.
Onkar Nath Mishra and Ors. vs. State (NCT of Delhi) and Anr.
Vijayan vs. State of Kerela and Anr.
Sajjan Kumar vs. Central Bureau of Investigation
State of Karnataka Lokayukta, Police Station, Bengaluru vs. M.R. Hiremath
Sheoraj Singh Ahlawat and Ors. vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Anr.
State by the Inspector of Police, Chennai vs. S. Selvi and Anr.
Discharge and framing of charge – Once Court rejects discharge application, it would proceed for framing of charge under Section 228 of Cr. P.C.
The court emphasized that at the stage of framing of charge and considering the discharge application, a mini trial is not permissible, and the judge is only required to consider whether a prima faci....
At the discharge stage under Section 227 Cr.P.C., the court must consider only the prosecution's materials, and strong suspicion is sufficient to proceed with the trial.
Though there are no limits of the powers of the Court under Section 482 of the Code but the more the power, the more due care and caution is to be exercised in invoking these powers. The power of qua....
Public servants cannot be prosecuted without necessary sanction under Section 197 of the CPC. The court must evaluate evidence for a prima facie case while deciding discharge applications.
The trial court's jurisdiction is limited, and it should not unduly interfere, and the exercise of revisional jurisdiction itself should not lead to injustice ex facie.
At the initial stage, the truth, veracity, and effect of the evidence are not to be meticulously judged, and the accused's defense is not to be looked into when seeking discharge under Section 227 of....
word "ground" according to Black's Law Dictionary, Black's Law Dictionary, 9th Edition connotes foundation or basis, and in the context of prosecution in a criminal case, it would be held to mean bas....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.