PATNA HIGH COURT
Vipul M. Pancholi and Sunil Dutta Mishra, JJ.
Ravi Kumar Mahto @
Ravi Kant Mahto and Anr. – Appellants
versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
Criminal Appeal (DB) No.494 of 2023
Decided on 27.2.2024
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 – Sections 4/16 and 6 – Information Technology Act, 2000 – Sections 67 and 67A – Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Sections 376 and 341 – Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 – Section 374(2) – Penetrative sexual assault on minor girl – Obscene Videography – Conviction and sentence – There are major contradictions in depositions given by prosecution witnesses – Doctor has specifically stated that victim may have sexual intercourse before or may be having sexual intercourse on regular intervals – Doctor has further stated that there is no injury on whole body of victim and hymen was old ruptured – Story narrated by victim about manner in which occurrence took place is not supported by evidence of Doctor – Prosecution has also failed to prove age of victim which is a vital aspect, by producing any documentary evidence – Investigating Officer has failed to produce any school register or birth certificate of victim – Even from medical evidence, it is revealed that age of victim was determined as 16 to 17 years – Margin in age ascertained is two years on either side – Victim was not a minor – She has not alleged specific obscene act done by accused – Investigating Officer did not find any blood on place of occurrence – Prosecution has miserably failed to prove case against appellants beyond reasonable doubt – Impugned judgment and order quashed and set aside. (Paras 18.3 to 25)
Result: Appeal allowed.
JUDGMENT (ORAL)
Vipul M. Pancholi, J.—The present appeal has been filed under Section-374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred as ‘Cr.P.C.’) challenging the common judgment of conviction dated 3rd April, 2023 and order of sentence dated 10-04- 2023 passed by learned Exclusive Special Judge (POCSO Act), Saran at Chapra, in connection with ST POCSO No. 40/2020, (arising out of Kopa P.S. Case No. 117 of 2020) by which the appellant No.1 has been convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 4/6 of the POCSO Act and Sections 376 and 341 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo 10 years rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs. 25,000/- under Section 4 of the POCSO Act, 20 years rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs.25,000/- under Section 6 of the POCSO Act and simple imprisonment for one month under Section 341 1.P.C. Appellant no.2 has been convicted under sections 4/16, 6 of the POCSO Act and Sections 376/109 and 341 of the Indian Penal Code and sections 67 and 67A of the IT Act and has been sentenced to undergo 10 years rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs. 25000/- under Section 4/16 of the POCSO Act, 20 years rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs. 25,000/- under Section 6 of the POCSO Act, simple imprisonment for one month under Section 341 I.P.C., simple imprisonment for one year and fine of Rs. 50,000/- under Section 67 of the IT Act and simple imprisonment for one year and fine of Rs. 50,000/- under section 67A of the IT Act. All the sentences have been directed to run concurrently.
2. Heard Mr. Harshvardhan Shivsundaram, learned Advocate, for the appellants and Mr. Sujit Kumar Singh, learned A.P.P. for the respondent-State.
3. Prosecution story in brief is as under:—
“On 27.05.2020 the victim’s mother had gone to the agricultural field for cutting grass asking her to come after one hour and collect the grass. As per instruction, at about 5:00 p.m., she was going to the field for collecting the grass when accused Ravi Kant Mahto (appellant No.1) and Mani Kumar @ Kaku (appellant No.2) of village-Basdila, P.S. Kopa, surrounded her with oblique motive and accused Ravi Kant Mahto caught hold of her, took her to a nearby pit, pulled off her lower garment (Salwar), tore her Samij, pushed her down into the pit and started doing obscene acts with her body and accused Mani Kumar @ Kaku started capturing the incident in his mobile phone upon which she started raising alarm on which her mother came running and saved her. On seeing her mother at the scene, both the accused ran away. She returned home with her mother. By that time, the video clip prepared by accused Mani Kumar was made viral on Internet. Her mother went to the house of the accused to complain about the act of making the video clip viral when father of accused Ravi Kant, namely Naresh Mahto, Chandreshwar Mahto, Indrajeet Mahto, Rahul Kumar, Lakhan Kumar and Vishnu Kumar, all armed with weapons like Lathi, Danda, Spear etc. chased her away. She somehow managed to reach the house. Again, all the accused came to the doorstep and started beating her family members in which the brothers of the victim, namely Rupesh Kumar, Pawan Kumar, Munna Kumar and the elder aunt of the victim were seriously injured. On hearing commotion, local people assembled at the place and saved them.”
4. After filing of the F.I.R., the investigating agency carried out the investigation and, during the course of investigation, the Investigating Officer recorded the statement of the witnesses and collected the relevant documents and thereafter filed the charge-sheet against the accused. As the case was exclusively triable by the Court of Sessions, the case was committed to the Court of Sessions.
5. Before the Trial Court prosecution examined P.W. 1 Santosh Mahto, father of the victim, P.W. 2 Durgawati Devi, mother of the victim, P.W.3, Dr. Kiran Ojha, the doctor who medically examined the victim, P.W. 4, the victim, P.W. 5 Sunil Kumar Thakur, the Investigating Offi
Jaya Mala V. Home Secretary, Government of J. and K. and Ors.
Penetrative sexual assault on girl – Age of victim is a crucial factor in POCSO cases.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of proving the age of the victim in cases under the POCSO Act and the reliance on the trustworthy and unblemished evidence of the vi....
The prosecution must prove charges beyond a reasonable doubt, and contradictions in testimony and medical evidence warrant acquittal.
The prosecution must conclusively establish the victim's age under the POCSO Act, and inconsistencies in the victim's testimony can undermine the case against the accused, warranting acquittal.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for conclusive evidence to establish the commission of offenses, especially in cases involving serious allegations such as rape,....
The burden of proof under Sec. 29 of the POCSO Act, consistency of evidence, and the applicability of relevant sections of the POCSO Act and IPC in cases of sexual offenses against minors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.