Arun Kumar VS State of Karnataka

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

K. NATARAJAN
Arun Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent

Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Sri. Mahantesh Patil, Advocate
For the Respondent No.1: Sri. Jamadar Shahabuddin, HCGP
For the Respondent No.2:Sri. S. S. Mamadapur, Advocate

ORDER (ORAL)

K. Natarajan, J.—This petition is filed by the petitioner / accused under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhita –2023 (hereinafter referred as BNSS) for quashing First Information and FIR in Crime No.180/2024, registered by the Lingasugur Police Station, for the offences punishable under Sections 376, 323, 506 and 420 of IPC, pending on the file of Prl. Civil Judge (Jr. Dn) and JMFC, Lingasugur, Dist: Raichur.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned High Court Government Pleader for the respondent No.1 – State and the learned counsel for the respondent No.2.

3. The case of the prosecution is that as per the first information lodged by the respondent No.2 before the police on 01.07.2024, alleging that she is working as a nurse in a Government Hospital, Lingasugur. Her husband met with an accident on 28.03.2021, admitted in the Government Hospital and he was died on 30.03.2021. During the time of treatment and after the death of her husband, the accused / petitioner said to be working in the same Hospital as ‘D’ group employee. He was helped the complainant while treatment. After the death of her husband and the accused frequently used t