IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
VIVEK KUMAR BIRLA, ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL, JJ.
Deepu and Others – Petitioners
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh and Others – Respondents
Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 12287 of 2024
Decided On : 06-08-2024
(A) Indian Penal Code - Sections 376 (2)(n), 354, 147, 452, 504, 506 - POCSO Act - FIR quashing - The FIR was registered under IPC prior to the enforcement of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) and Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) - The court held that the FIR should be registered under IPC for offences committed before the enforcement of new laws, and the investigation procedure would follow BNSS. (Paras 3, 15, 16)
(B) Criminal Procedure Code - Section 41-A - The court emphasized adherence to procedural guidelines for arrest in cases with lesser punishments, referencing Supreme Court precedents. (Paras 18, 19)
Facts of the case:
The petitioners sought to quash an FIR registered under IPC and POCSO Act, arguing against their wrongful implication and the necessity of following procedural safeguards for arrest.
Findings of Court:
The court found the FIR valid under IPC and directed adherence to procedural safeguards for arrest.
Issues: The main issues were the applicability of new criminal laws to pending investigations and the procedural safeguards for arrest.
Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that FIRs for offences committed before the enforcement of new laws should be registered under IPC, with investigations following BNSS procedures.
Result: Petition disposed of in terms of the judgments noted.
JUDGMENT :
1. Personal affidavit of Superintendent of Police, Hamirpur filed today is taken on record.
2. Heard Sri Sanjay Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as Sri P.C. Srivastava, Additional Advocate General, assisted by Sri J.K. Upadhyay, Additional Government Advocate and Sri Bhaiya Lal Yadav, learned counsel for the informant.
3. The present writ petition has been preferred with the prayer to quash the impugned First Information Report dated 3.7.2024, registered as Case Crime No. 0271 of 2024, under Sections 376 (2)(n), 354, 147, 452, 504, 506 IPC and Section 4 POCSO Act, PS Maudaha, District Hamirpur, and for a direction to the respondents not to arrest the petitioners in pursuance of impugned First Information Report.
4. On 23.7.2024 the following order was passed:
Learned AGA for State submits that the victim is aged about 14 years and she was medically examined and seeks some time to get the instruction in this regard.
List again on 30.7.2024 as fresh.”
5. In compliance with the above quoted order, learned AGA has filed a personal affidavit of the Superintendent of Police, Hamirpur. In the affidavit, it is mentioned that Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (B.N.S.) came into force on 1.7.2024 whereas the incident in question had taken place between 2.4.2024 to 28.6.2024, therefore, the first information report was lodged under the provisions of the Indian Penal Code (I.P.C.). It is also mentioned in the personal affidavit that in respect of the procedure after commencement of B.N.S.S. a circular dated 4.7.2024 was issued by the Police Technical Services Headquarters, Uttar Pradesh which provides that if any offence is committed prior to the enforcement of B.N.S. the FIR would be registered under the provisions of Indian Penal code, and procedure of investigation would be followed as per Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (B.N.S.S.). The said circular dated 4.7.2024 issued by the Police Technical Services Headquarters, Uttar Pradesh is quoted as under:
6. However, learned counsel for the petitioners has contended that the procedure mentioned in the above noted circular dated 4.7.2024 is incorrect for the offence occurred prior to the enforcement of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, because for this offence the F.I.R. is registered after enforcement of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as “BNS”) as well as the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as “BNSS”), then the F.I.R. should be registered under the BNS.
7. To decide this issue, it would be relevant to quote Section 531 of BNSS as under:
(1) The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is hereby repealed.
(2) Notwithstanding such repeal:
(a) if, immediately before the date on which this Sanhita comes into force, there is any appeal, application, trial, inquiry or investigation pending, then, such appeal, application, trial, inquiry or investigation shall be disposed of, continued, held or made, as the case may be, in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, as in force immediately before such commencement (hereinafter referred to as the said Code), as if this Sanhita had not come into force.
(b) all notifications published, proclamations issued, powers conferred, forms provided by rules, local jurisdictions defined, sentences passed and orders, rules and appointments, not being appointments as Special Magistrates, made under the said Code and which are in force immediately before the commencement of this Sanhita, shall be deemed, respectively, to have been published, issued, conferred, specified, defined, passed or made under the corresponding provisions of this Sanhita.
(
Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar
Hitendra Vishnu Thakur & Others Vs. State of Maharashtra & Others
Neena Aneja & Another Vs. Jai Prakash Associates Ltd. (2022) 2 SCC 161
Satendra Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and Another
FIRs for offences committed before new laws must be registered under IPC, with investigations following BNSS procedures.
Crime and investigation – If any offence is committed prior to enforcement of new criminal laws, then if F.I.R. is registered after enforcement of new criminal laws, then same will be registered unde....
The court ruled that bail applications filed after the BNSS's enforcement for FIRs registered before its enactment must comply with the BNSS provisions, emphasizing the retrospective application of p....
The court established that pending matters under the CrPC, 1973, are preserved by the BNSS, 2023, while new incidents post-enactment must adhere to the BNSS.
The repeal of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, effective from 01.07.2024, mandates that all new petitions must be filed under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
FIR registered under wrong law can be quashed but complaint can be retained and filed afresh under right law.
State notification deemed to amend cognizability status of offenses under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita; mala fide motives behind F.I.R. questioned.
The savings clause in Section 531(2)(a) of the BNSS ensures that ongoing investigations initiated under the Cr.P.C. prior to the enactment of the BNSS are governed by the old law, thereby maintaining....
(1) Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 – Section 531(2)(a) – Not only pending trial / appeal, but even an inquiry and/or investigation, which is underway prior to coming into force of BNSS, sha....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.