ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Vivek Kumar Birla and
Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal, JJ.
Deepu and Ors. – Petitioners
versus
State of U.P. and Ors. – Respondents
Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No.12287 of 2024
Decided on 6.8.2024
(A) Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 – Sections 176 and 531 – General Clauses Act, 1897 – Section 6 – Repeal and savings – Repeal of Cr.P.C. shall not affect any investigation, legal proceeding or remedy in respect of any liability, penalty or punishment accrued or incurred under repealed Act and such investigation, legal proceeding or remedy will continue under repealed Act – Repeal of I.P.C. or Cr.P.C. will not affect any right, liability incurred under repealed Act – Despite repealing of IPC and Cr.P.C., liability to get punishment under IPC will continue and remedy like appeal under Cr.P.C. will remain as it is but forum of appeal being procedural in nature will be as per B.N.S.S. (Para 10)
(B) Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 – Sections 176 and 531 – Constitution of India – Article 20 – Crime and investigation – If any offence is committed prior to enforcement of new criminal laws, then if F.I.R. is registered after enforcement of new criminal laws, then same will be registered under provision of I.P.C. in view of the Article 20 of Constitution of India, but procedure for investigation will be as per BNSS – Similarly, in case offence is committed after enforcement of new criminal laws and thereafter F.I.R. is registered, then investigation would be conducted as per BNSS – However, in case offence is committed prior to enforcement of new criminal laws, and F.I.R. is also registered prior to enforcement of new criminal laws then procedure of investigation would be as per Cr.P.C. in view of Section 531(2)(a) of BNSS. (Paras 15 and 16)
Result: Petition disposed of with observations.
JUDGMENT
Personal affidavit of Superintendent of Police, Hamirpur filed today is taken on record.
2. Heard Sri Sanjay Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as Sri P.C. Srivastava, Additional Advocate General, assisted by Sri J.K. Upadhyay, Additional Government Advocate and Sri Bhaiya Lal Yadav, learned counsel for the informant.
3. The present writ petition has been preferred with the prayer to quash the impugned First Information Report dated 3.7.2024, registered as Case Crime No. 0271 of 2024, under Sections 376 (2)(n), 354, 147, 452, 504, 506 IPC and Section 4 POCSO Act, PS Maudaha, District Hamirpur, and for a direction to the respondents not to arrest the petitioners in pursuance of impugned First Information Report.
4. On 23.7.2024 the following order was passed:
“The impugned FIR dated 3.7.2024 is registered under the provision of Indian Penal Code and not under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) which came into force on 1st July, 2024. The Superintendent of Police, Hamirpur shall file an affidavit why the FIR has not been registered under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS)
Learned AGA for State submits that the victim is aged about 14 years and she was medically examined and seeks some time to get the instruction in this regard.
List again on 30.7.2024 as fresh.”
5. In compliance with the above quoted order, learned AGA has filed a personal affidavit of the Superintendent of Police, Hamirpur. In the affidavit, it is mentioned that Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (B.N.S.) came into force on 1.7.2024 whereas the incident in question had taken place between 2.4.2024 to 28.6.2024, therefore, the first information report was lodged under the provisions of the Indian Penal Code (I.P.C.). It is also mentioned in the personal affidavit that in respect of the procedure after commencement of B.N.S.S., a circular dated 4.7.2024 was issued by the Police Technical Services Headquarters, Uttar Pradesh which provides that if any offence is committed prior to the enforcement of B.N.S., the FIR would be registered under the provisions of Indian Penal code, and procedure of investigation would be followed as per Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (B.N.S.S.). The said circular dated 4.7.2024 issued by the Police Technical Services Headquarters, Uttar Pradesh is quoted as under:
(Matter in Other Language)
6. However, learned counsel for the petitioners has contended that the procedure mentioned in the above noted circular dated 4.7.2024 is incorrect for the offence occurred prior to the enforcement of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, because for this offence the F.I.R. is registered after enforcement of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as “BNS”) as well as the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as “BNSS”), then the F.I.R. should be registered under the BNS.
7. To decide this issue, it would be relevant to quote Section 531 of BNSS as under:-
“531. Repeal and savings. - (1) The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is hereby repealed.
(2) Notwithstanding such repeal—
(a) if, immediately before the date on which this Sanhita comes into force, there
is any appeal, application, trial, inquiry or investigation pending, then, such appeal,
application, trial, inquiry or investigation shall be disposed of, continued, held or made, as the case may be, in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, as in force immediately before such commencement (hereinafter referred to as the said Code), as if this Sanhita had not come into force;
(b) all notifications published, proclamations issued, powers conferred, forms provided by rules, local jurisdictions defined, sentences passed and orders, rules and appointments, not being appointments as Special Magistrates, made under the said Code and which are in force immediately before the commencement of this Sanhita, shall be deemed, respectively, to have been published, issued, conferred, specified, defined, passed o
Hitendra Vishnu Thakur and Ors. vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Neena Aneja and Anr. vs. Jai Prakash Associates Ltd.
Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar
Satendra Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and Anr.
Crime and investigation – If any offence is committed prior to enforcement of new criminal laws, then if F.I.R. is registered after enforcement of new criminal laws, then same will be registered unde....
FIRs for offences committed before new laws must be registered under IPC, with investigations following BNSS procedures.
The court ruled that bail applications filed after the BNSS's enforcement for FIRs registered before its enactment must comply with the BNSS provisions, emphasizing the retrospective application of p....
The court established that pending matters under the CrPC, 1973, are preserved by the BNSS, 2023, while new incidents post-enactment must adhere to the BNSS.
The repeal of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, effective from 01.07.2024, mandates that all new petitions must be filed under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
FIR registered under wrong law can be quashed but complaint can be retained and filed afresh under right law.
The savings clause in Section 531(2)(a) of the BNSS ensures that ongoing investigations initiated under the Cr.P.C. prior to the enactment of the BNSS are governed by the old law, thereby maintaining....
(1) Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 – Section 531(2)(a) – Not only pending trial / appeal, but even an inquiry and/or investigation, which is underway prior to coming into force of BNSS, sha....
State notification deemed to amend cognizability status of offenses under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita; mala fide motives behind F.I.R. questioned.
Point of law : The rule of construction laid down in Section 8 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 also requires that reference to the repealed enactment made in any instrument be construed as reference....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.