SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO
Gollamudi Gowri Chidvilasa – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioners: Umesh Chandra P.V.G.
For the Respondent: Public Prosecutor

ORDER (COMMON)

Since these three Criminal Petitions are filed, under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. and Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, ‘BNSS’), seeking anticipatory bail, by different Accused i.e. Crl.P.No.6390 of 2024 (arrayed as A.14), Crl.P.No.6553 of 2024 (arrayed as A.6), and Crl.P.No.6389 of 2024 (arrayed as A.13), in same crime viz. Crime No.382 of 2022 of Mangalagiri Town Police Station, Guntur District, they are being taken up together for disposal by way of this Common Order.

2. A case has been registered against the Petitioners and others for the offences punishable under Sections 465, 467, 468, 420, 506 r/w 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short, “IPC”).

3. In summary, the Prosecution asserts that this case involves allegations of cheating, forgery of documents, forgery of signatures, and criminal intimidation, which took place prior to 15.07.2022, at 2:00 PM, at Venus Hotel, Mangalagiri. The complaint was lodged on 15.07.2022, where the complainant stated that A.1, a Home Guard employee from Guduru, Nellore District, assured him of a Home Guard position in exchange for Rs.8,50,000/-. Consequently, the complainant transferred Rs.4,00,000/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top