Back
CHAITALI CHATTERJEE DAS
Sher Singh @ Satya Narayan Chouhan – Appellant
Versus
State of West Bengal – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Chaitali Chatterjee Das, J.—This Appeal has been filed under Section 374 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgement and order dated September 29, 2007 passed by the learned, Additional Sessions, Judge, Fast Track, 1st Court, Asansol, Burdwan, in Sessions Trial number 38 / 2006 and Session case no.5/2006, convicting the appellant under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code and sentence him to suffer Imprisonment for seven years and to pay a fine of Rs.2000 only.
2. Bereft of any details ,the prosecution case was launched on the basis of statement of Ram Lakshman Mehra, son of late Bishnu Mehra, loco driver, Chinakuri, Imli Dhwara, Police station, Kulti District Burdwan made before the police officer of Neyatnatpur Out Post at P.S Kulti, which was treated as the written complaint. It was stated by said, Ram Laxman Mehra, who was working as Loco driver at Chinakuri colliery that on 16.10.1990, he and his son Kadam Dev were sleeping in his quarter in the night at about 10 P.M., then at about 1am on 17.10.90 Kote Singh asked repeatedly to open the door with a threat to break open the door.
3. On refusal to open the door he threatened to break open then out
Robbery – One credible witness outweighs the testimony of a number of other witnesses of indifferent character – Order of conviction can be passed on the basis of sole testimony of injured witness.
The prosecution must prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, and the benefit of doubt goes in favor of the accused when the evidence is inconsistent and unreliable.
The prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond a reasonable doubt, leading to the conviction's reversal.
Conviction cannot be sustained based on uncorroborated and inconsistent testimony of the victim, failing to meet evidentiary standards in sexual assault cases.
The need for consistency and credibility in evaluating evidence in criminal cases, and the requirement to prove common intention under S.149 IPC.
The conviction under Section 323 IPC was overturned due to discrepancies in witness testimonies and insufficient evidence supporting the prosecution's claims.
Murder – It is duty of prosecution to establish use of weapon discovered in commission of crime – Failure to do so may cause aberration in course of justice.
The importance of credible eyewitness testimony, reliable and clinching evidence, and the exclusion of every possible hypothesis except guilt in establishing guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
The conviction for murder cannot be sustained without corroborated and reliable testimony, especially when relying on child witnesses whose statements showed significant contradictions.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
