Back
ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Arun @ Arjun – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan, Through PP – Respondent
ORDER
Instant application for bail is filed under Section 483 of BNSS by the applicant-accused Arun @ Arjun S/o Ramniwas @ Lalaram in FIR No. 60/2025 dated 13.03.2025 registered at P.S. Mandhan, District-Kotputli Behror, whereby the applicant-accused was-charged under Sections 308(4) and 351(2) of BNS
2. Learned counsel for applicant submits that applicant-accused is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in the instant matter. He further submits that after registration of FIR on 13.03.2025 for incident of 04.03.2025, police has completed the investigation and filed a charge-sheet against the applicant-accused. He further submits that the statement of complainant was initially recorded on 08.03.2025 and thereafter supplementary statement of complainant were recorded on two occasions. He further submits that without any proper investigation, and recording statement of independent witnesses, present applicant-accused was arrested. He also submits that police has filed charge-sheet against 5 persons and kept pending against one person under Section 193 (9) of BNSS. He further referred order dated 16.05.2025 in respect of Udit Kumar, order dated 24.06.2025 in respect of
Bail cannot be granted in heinous offences.
The court emphasized that bail should not be granted if there is a strong likelihood of witness tampering and the accused is charged with a serious offence.
The court denied anticipatory bail due to the serious nature of the charges, the applicant's extensive criminal history, and the risk of influencing witnesses.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
