GITA GOPI
Rohan Kiritbhai Desai – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent
JUDGMENT (ORAL)
The appeals emanate from a common judgment and order, thus both the appeals were heard together.
1.1. Criminal Appeal No.446 of 2006 is filed by the appellant-original accused No.1-Rohan Kiritbhai Desai, while Criminal Appeal No.500 of 2006 is by the appellant-original accused No.2-Amit Devendrakumar Parmar. The above Appeals challenge the judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 23.02.2006 passed by the Fast Track Court No.1, Gandhinagar in Special Atrocity Case No.18 of 2005 for the offences punishable under Sections 363, 366, of Indian Penal Code (IPC) and under Section 3(1)(xi) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocity) Act, 1949 (hereinafter referred to in short as ‘the Atrocity Act’).
1.2. For the offence punishable under Section 363 of IPC, both the accused were sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment of two years and pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- and in default of payment of fine, were ordered to undergo further imprisonment of one month.
1.3. For the offence punishable under Section 366 of IPC, both the accused were sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment of two years and pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- and in default of paym
Mahadeo son of Kerba Maske v. State of Maharashtra and Another
Jarnail Singh v. State of Haryana
(1) Kidnapping – All kidnappings are confinement but not all confinements are kidnapping.(2) Kidnapping of girl by alluring her with false promise of marriage – Friendship as well as adolescent’s con....
(1) Mere recovery of a child from some other person ipso facto does not to prove offence under Section 363, IPC – Prosecution has to prove that accused either took or enticed minor out of keeping of ....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for clear and consistent evidence to establish the elements of a criminal offense, particularly regarding the age of the victim ....
Point of Law : Taking into consideration of these aspects on evidence and in absence of any documentary evidence, it can safely be said that on the date of alleged occurrence, the victim girl (PW-2) ....
Rape – Consent of minor has no legal sanctity.
The appellate court upheld the victim's minority and the accused's guilt for kidnapping and sexual assault, emphasizing the presumption of innocence and the need for compelling reasons to overturn ac....
The prosecution must establish the victim's age and the accused's intent beyond reasonable doubt in cases of sexual offences, and mere allegations without corroborative evidence are insufficient for ....
Charges under Sections 363, 366 IPC and Section 8 of POCSO Act require proof of inducement or coercion, which was not established as the victim left voluntarily.
Reliability of witnesses - Prosecution witnesses - Throughout cross-examination truthfulness of prosecution version was challenged to limited extent of veracity of witnesses who had been deposing bef....
An offence under Section 366 IPC, it is necessary for the prosecution to prove that the accused induced the complainant woman or compelled by force to go from any place, that such inducement was by d....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.