GITA MITTAL, ANU MALHOTRA
Dayawati – Appellant
Versus
Yogesh Kumar Gosain – Respondent
As a result of the pronouncement in Afcons, Section 89 of the C.P.C. thus stands modified to the extent noted above.
39. So far as the procedure to be adopted by a court upon reference of the disputes in a civil case to an ADR mechanism is concerned, the same stands further considered in Afcons. The relevant portion of the judgment is reproduced as under:
“43. We may summarise the procedure to be adopted by a court under Section 89 of the Code as under:
(a) When the pleadings are complete, before framing issues, the court shall fix a preliminary hearing for appearance of parties. The court shou
Salem Advocate Bar Assn. v. Union of India (Salem Bar I)
Salem Advocate Bar Assn. v. Union Of India (Salem Bar II)
Afcons Infrastructure Ltd. & Anr. v. Cherian Varkey Constructions Co. Pvt. Ltd.
Goaplast P. Ltd. V. Chico Ursula D’Souza & Anr.
Kaushalya Devi Massand v. Roopkishore Khore
Damodar S. Prabhu v. Sayed Babalal H
Indian Banks Association & Ors. v. Union of India
K. Govindam Kutty Menon v. C.D. Shaji
Madhya Pradesh State Legal Services Authority v. Prateek Jain
Sreelal v. Murali Menon & Anr.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.