PATNA HIGH COURT
Navaniti Prasad Singh, J.
M/s Maa Durga Enterprises
Versus
State Of Bihar
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 14312 of 2007 ;
Decided On : SEPTEMBER 24, 2008
Constitution of India-Article 226-Compensation for the damage caused by abuse of power by the authorities-Petitioner was in lawful possession of the cold storage which was illegally and unlawfully locked and sealed by BIADA with 10000 bags of potatoes/potatoes seeds therein-Cold storage unsealed after 6 days and during the said period potatoes lay uncared for and consequently rotted-Action of BIADA subsequently cancelling the lease of BISCOMAUN already set aside by the H.C. in a collateral independent proceeding-Petitioner suffered because of actions of the BIADA officials acting in violation and excess of the powers vested in such agency and that too without care and caution-Compensation of Rs. one lakh awarded-BIADA also directed to compensate the petitioner if it is held liable in the proceedings before the District Consumer Forum-Writ petition allowed. (Paras 17 to 23 and 38)
Constitution of India-Article 226-Relief in case of officers acting in excess of the statutory powers-If citizens are not granted relief by the H.C. on the ground that officers were exercising either statutory power or powers akin to statutory powers, the result would be total anarchy-If such action is permitted then statutory powers would flagrantly be violated to the detriment of the citizens rights with no safeguard or no relief to the citizen, who may have suffered irreparable injury in the meantime till the orders are set aside. (Paras 33 to 38)
2008(2) PLJR 792, AIR 1977 SC 619, AIR 1990 SC 513, 1968 Acc CJ 32; (1969) Lab IC 501 : (Punj.), AIR 1962 SC 933, AIR 1994 SC 2663, 1993 AIR SC 1960, AIR 2000 SC 988, 2007(1) PLJR 797, 2007(4) PLJR 250, 2008(1) PLJR 707 (DB), 2008(2) PLJR 538-Referred to.
1. The present case is illustrative of how responsible Officers abuse their power indiscriminately to the detriment of the rights of citizens. The petitioner is a proprietorship firm, which was running cold storage for storing potatoes/potatoes seeds. Its cold storage was allegedly arbitrarily sealed by the authorities of Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority (hereinafter referred to as "BIADA") and later realizing that the sealing would result in the stocks of potato to rot unsealed it, which was too late and which damage has left the petitioner to face large number of compensation applications lodged against the petitioner before the District Consumer Forum, Madhubani running into several lakh of rupees. BIADA defends its action and notwithstanding large number of cases filed against the petitioner, as well as, admission of its own Officers, denies any loss and seeks to cover it up for obvious fear of being held liable to compensate the petitioner and it is for these reliefs the writ petition ultimately came to be heard for.
2. Originally, the writ petition was filed against letter dated 30.10.2007 of the Executive Director f BIADA at Patna issued pursuant to telephonic direction of its Managing Director, to the Development Officers of BIADA in the Regional Office at Darbhanga. By this letter or telephonic instructions of the Managing Director of BIADA the Development Officers were directed to immediately lock and seal the cold storage of Bihar State Cooperative Marketing Union Limited (hereinafter referred to as "BISCOMAUN"), which was being operated for allegedly non-industrial purposes and was being operated by another (Petitioner) without prior permission of BIADA. This was followed by posting of guards of BIADA at the cold storage premises, on 2.11.2007, restraining operation of the cold storage. Apprehending that potatoes would rot if the petitioner was not permitted to operate the cold storage and deliver potatoes to the farmers and that BIADA may lock and seal the premises, the writ application was filed.
3. Subsequently, interlocutory application has been filed bringing further facts on record. It is now stated that while writ application was being filed, on 4.11.2007 the cold storage was formally locked and sealed by Officers of BIADA with the help of Executive Magistrate and police, in spite of protest on behalf of petitioner with 10,000 bags of potatoes/potatoes seeds weighing 50 Kgs. each totalling to about 5000 quintals. On behalf of petitioner on 5.11.2007 protest was lodged before the Managing Director of BIADA at Patna, clearly stating that Potatoes would get destroyed. Pursuant thereto, on 6.11.2007 the Executive Director (pursuant to whose intimation that the cold storage had been locked and sealed) directed the Development Officer, Regional Office at Darbhanga of BIADA to immediately open the cold storage otherwise potatoes and other things stored therein would start rotting. Pursuant to this on 7.11.2007 the Officers of BIADA came alongwith Executive Magistrate and others and unsealed the premises, clearly stating that they had sealed the premises in presence of. Executive Magistrate, on 4.11.2007 and now on 7.11.2007 they in presence of Executive Magistrate unsealed the same. In the said document prepared they also noted that there were about 10,000 bags of potatoes/potatoes seeds in the cold storage now in rotting condition. The said report was signed on behalf of petitioner and by two Officers of BIADA. In the meantime, the report of sealing as sent by the Development Officer of BIADA to BIADA Head Office at Patna dated 4.11.2007 is also on record. This also estimates that there were about 10,000 bags of potatoes out of which 8,000 bags were in the chamber and about 2000 bags outside the chamber. It is then pointed out that on 26.11.2007 at the instance of BIADA a first information report was lodged with Sakari Police Station, which on the same day was forwarded to Pandaul (Sakari Police
Chairman, Railway Board And Others V/s. Chandrima Das (Mrs.) And Others
N. Nagendra Rao & Co. V/s. State Of Andhra Pradesh
Ram Rattan And Others V/s. State Of Uttar Pradesh
Smt. Nilabati Behera Alias Lalita Behera V/s. State Of Orissa And Others
State Of Rajasthan V/s. Mst. Vidhyawati
Shishir Kumar Jain V/s. The Patna Regional Development Authority & Ors.
Emarat Co-operative Housing Societies Limited V/s. The State Of Bihar And Others
Mahesh Ram & Ors. V/s. State Of Bihar
Md. Abu Hasnain V/s. State Of Bihar & Ors.
R.G. Holdings Private Limited V/s. The State Of Bihar & Anr.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.