SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Pat) 496

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
SHIVAJI PANDEY, J.
Bipin Tiwari & Ors. – Appellants
Versus
State Of Bihar & Ors. – Respondents
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.328 5951, 3651 & 3678 of 2014
Decided On : 27-01-2015

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
(In CWJC No. 328 of 2014)
For the Petitioners: Mr. Ramesh Kumar Agrawal, Adv.
For the Respondents: Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, AC to SC-30
(In CWJC No.5951 of 2014)
For the Petitioners: Mr. Ramesh Kumar Agrawal, Adv.
For the Respondents: Mr. Abbas Haider, SC-16
Mr. Ramesh Chandra, AC to SC-16
(In CWJC No. 3651 of 2014)
For the Petitioners: Mr. Ramesh Kumar Agrawal, Adv.
For the Respondents: Mr. Ashok Kumar. SC-11
Mr. Amresh Kumar, AC to SC-11
(In CWJC No. 3678 of 2014)
For the Petitioners: Mr. Ramesh Kumar Agrawal, Adv.
For the Respondents: Mr. Sheo Shankar Prasad, SC-10
Mr. Anil Kumar, AC to SC-10

Headnote:Bihar Agricultural Land (Conversion for Non-agricultural purposes) Act, 2010-Sec. 1 (3)-Whether the Act is retrospective in nature?-Unless the status shows by express or by necessairy intendment that the Act has retrospective operation, it will have prospective effect-the provisions of the Act prima facie do show that the Act will be made operational from the date it is notified by the State Government, not prior to the Notification-so, the Act will be operational from the date it is notified by the State Government-the State Government by notification cannot make it operational from anterior date i.e. from the date when it has been passed and received assent from the Governor as Section 1 (3) of the Act does not authorize to give retrospectivity to the statute-however, as the Sub-section (3) of Section 2 of the Act provides the application for permission for conversion is to be filed in the form prescribed under the Rules, in absence of Rules, Act is not workable. (Paras 38 & 52)

       Bihar Agricultural Land (Conversion for non-agricultural purposes) Act, 2010-Section 2(i)-Market Value of Land-mere fixation of market under the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 will not be sufficient for charging 10 per cent of the market value unless that market value is notified in the official Gazette-so it is a legislature mandate that the charging of fee can be made only after due notification in the official Gazette-there being no such notification, the value of the land fixed by the Collector under the Indian Stamp Act is not sufficient-demand of penalty conversion fee imposed by the impugned notification quashed. (Para 49)

       

JUDGMENT :

Shivaji Pandey, J.

Heard counsel for the parties. As in all the cases, identical questions have been raised, as such, all t he cases are being disposed of by a common order.

2. For brevity, the facts of CWJC No. 328 of 2014 is being taken into consideration.

3. In the present case i.e. CWJC No. 328 of 2014, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 28th August 2013 (Annexure-7) passed in Record No. 05 of 2012-13 by the Sub-Divisional Officer, Kishanganj (Respondent no.3) under Section 6(3) of the Bihar Agricultural Land (Conversion for Non-agricultural purposes) Act, 2010 (hereinafter, in short, referred to as the “conversion Act”) by which he has arbitrarily and illegally levied Rs.1,11,251/- as conversion fee and Rs.l55,625/- as penalty being 50 per cent of the conversion fee on the petitioner’s land and issued demand notice dated 28th August 2013 (Annexure-8) against the petitioner for payment of total amount of Rs.1,66,876/-.

4. Filtering the unnecessary facts, petitioner runs a brick kiln in the name and style “M/s Narayan Tiwari Bricks” situated in village Raja Ganw in the district of Kishanganj. The brick kiln was established in the year 2005-06. As has been claimed, the area of the brick kiln is 1.67 Acre, out of total area of 3.27 acres of land and rest 1.67 acres of land is used for drying the raw bricks for 3 – 4 months and later on it is used for agricultural purpose.

5. Before establishing the brick kiln petitioner had obtained license under the Bihar Minor Mineral Concession Rules 1972 and also takes Emission Consent Order every year since 2005-06 from the Bihar State Pollution Control Board. It has further been submitted that the petitioner is also holding Tax Identification Number under the provisions of the Bihar Value Added Tax Act, 2005 and regularly paying VAT to the State of Bihar. The State of Bihar has enacted the Conversion Act, 2010 which was published in the Bihar Gazette dated 6th April 2010 but the same has been enforced from 1st October 2012 vide Notification No. 362(8) dated 28th April 2011 and published in the Bihar Gazette No. Patna 515 dated 1st October 2012, in pursuance thereof the Government of Bihar has also framed the Bihar Agriculture Land (Conversion for Non-agricultural purposes) Rules, 2011 (hereinafter, in short, to be referred to as the “conversion Rules”). The same has been published in the Bihar Gazette dated 16th March 2011.

7. After publication of the Rules under the Gazette Notification, as has been stated in the writ application, petitioner applied in the prescribed form before the Sub-divisional Officer, Kishanganj for grant of permission under the Conversion Act on 18th January 2012. Further filed an application dated 12th January 2013 for permission to convert the land for running brick kiln stating that 1.60 acres of land is used for kiln and the raw bricks are spread and dried over the rest 1.67 acres of land which is subsequently used for agricultural purpose but no order was passed by the Sub-divisional Officer on the said application filed by the petitioner for grant of permission and, as such, petitioner could not deposit the conversion fee with the State Government.

8. The Circle Officer, Thakurganj vide his order dated 14th February 2013 passed in Record No. 5 of 2012-13(Annexue-7) has recommended to the Sub-divisional Officer for permission to the petitioner after realizing the conversion fee and penalty and, accordingly, the Sub-divisional Officer vide order dated 3rd March 2013 directed his Office for issuance of show cause notice in form-5(a) under Section 6(1) of the Conversion Act. Subsequently, a show cause notice was issued on 13th March 2013 in Form-5(a) under Section 6(1) of the Conversion Act with the allegation that the petitioner has converted his agricultural land for non-agricultural purpose in unauthorized manner after commencement of the Conversion Act without obtaining required permission as provided under the conversion Act used the land fo







































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top