SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Pat) 987

PRAKASH CHANDRA JAISWAL
Shyam Nath Sah – Appellant
Versus
Shankar Kumar Gupta – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mukesh Prasad Singh, Adv., Durgesh Kumar Singh, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

Prakash Chandra Jaiswal, J.

Heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned counsel for the respondent nos. 2 and 3 on this Miscellaneous Appeal. No one turned up on behalf of respondent no. 1 despite service of notice.

2. This miscellaneous appeal has been preferred against the judgment dated 31.08.2010 and award dated 13.09.2010 passed by learned 7th Additional District Judge-cum-Motor Vehicle Accident Claim Tribunal, Muzaffarpur in Claim Case no. 05 of 2009 whereby the learned Tribunal allowing the claim petition filed by the claimants, directed the O.P. no. 2 Reliance General Insurance Company Limited to pay compensation to the tune of Rs. 84,500/- along with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of filing of the claim case till its realization to the claimants.

3. Factual matrix of the case is that Claim Case no. 05 of 2009 was filed by the claimants-appellants under Section 166 of the M.V. Act for awarding compensation to the tune of Rs. 2,79,500/- on account of death of their father, namely, Ganga Sah in motor vehicle accident with the case in succinct that on 07.10.2008 claimant Pramod Kumar Sah and deceased Ganga Sah were proceeding to their house through Dumra













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top