JUDGMENT

Shivaji Pandey, J. - Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the High Court, learned counsel for the State and learned Senior counsel for the Bihar Public Service Commission.

2. In the present case, the petitioner is seeking appointment against the post advertised vide Advertisement No.06 of 2018 as having claimed that she secured identical marks of 517 as that of last candidate, who has been selected under the unreserved category. It has further been submitted that six persons under the unreserved category did not join the post and as such, the petitioner being next one in the merit list having secured 517 marks to be appointed on that post.

3. The facts of this case are that an Advertisement No.06 of 2018 was issued by the Bihar Public Service Commission for the appointment of 349 candidates on the posts of Civil Judge (Junior Division). The petitioner applied and appeared in the examination but, could not get her place in the final select list. Sri Amit Kumar Singh, who is the last candidate selected on the post of Civil Judge (Junior Division) having secured 517 marks. It has been brought to our notice that about six candidates under the unreserved c