RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD
Anand Kishore Prasad Sinha S/o Late Kameshwar Prasad Sinha – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar, through the Chief Secretary, Govt of Bihar – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. This writ application has been preferred seeking issuance of a writ in the nature of a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ/order/direction to the respondent authorities to take immediate steps to protect the life of the petitioner and his family. Further prayer has been made to direct the respondent authorities to drive out the anti-social elements who have forcibly entered into the office premises of the petitioner who is an Advocate practising at Samastipur Bar. The petitioner prays that his possession be also restored.
Brief facts of the case
2. It is the case of the petitioner that he is a senior lawyer, aged about 78 years practising in the Samastipur Civil Court. His residence and office are on contiguous piece of land measuring around 4 kathas containing different plots situated in ward no. 12 at Samastipur. According to the petitioner, his residence is situated at new holding no. 187 (old 169) bearing new plot no. 109, 109k (old plot no. 153 and 154). His office as lawyers’ chamber is situated at new holding no. 185 (old no. 167), bearing new plot no. 115 (old plot no. 152) and new plot no. 117 (old plot no. 152). The petitioner claims to have purchase
Mohan Pandey (supra) and Dwarka Prasad Agrawal Vs. BD Agrawal reported in (2003) 6 SCC 230
in Krishna Ram Mahale v. Mrs. Shobha Venkat Rao
Kumaraswami Mudaliar v. Rajammal AIR 1957 Mad 563
Charan Lal Sahu v. Union of India
Mohan Pandey & Ors. Vs. Smt. Usha Rani Rajgaria reported in 1992 (4) SCC 61
Roshina. T Vs. Abdul Azeez K.T. & Ors. reported in 2019 (1) PLJR 230 SC = (2019) 2 SCC 329
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.