Rahul Kumar vs State Of Bihar - 2021 Supreme(Pat) 384

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2021 Supreme(Pat) 384

AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH
Rahul Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
Navjot Yeshu, Advocate, Uma Shankar Prasad Singh, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J. - The matter has been heard via video conferencing.

2. Heard Mr. Navjot Yeshu, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Uma Shankar Prasad Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor (hereinafter referred to as the 'APP') for the State.

3. The petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with Puraini PS Case No. 126 of 2020 dated 03.08.2020, instituted under Sections 448, 376, 511, 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

4. The allegation against the petitioner is that he had tried to commit rape of the informant in her house at 2'O clock in the night and on cry raised, the other family members had come and he was detained in the house and when the police came, the room was opened. It was further alleged that the petitioner used to put pressure on the informant, as her husband used to work outside, to establish physical relationship with threat that he would kill her son.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the allegation is false and that the petitioner had gone to the house of the informant to ask for return of the money which was taken by her family earlier from him. It was submitted that the police had come to the house of the informant and i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document