Back
AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH
Vijay Kumar Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J. - The matter has been heard via video conferencing.
2. Heard Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh No.1, learned counsel for the petitioner; Ms. Renu Kumari, learned Additional Public Prosecutor (hereinafter referred to as the 'APP') for the State and Mr. Priyesh Kumar, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2.
3. The petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with Paroo PS Case No. 287 of 2015 dated 17.12.2015, instituted under Sections 493/376/341/323/504/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
4. The allegation against the petitioner is that he had married the opposite party no. 2 in a temple on 06.04.2014 and had kept the opposite party no. 2 at a rented place and they lived together as husband and wife and thereafter, on 26.04.2014, the petitioner went for training in the Army but kept the informant in a room at Muzaffarpur. Thereafter, it is alleged that the petitioner returned and kept the informant at a hotel at Hajipur and then went to Ahmadnagar in Maharashtra for training in the Army and the informant became pregnant. Further, it is stated that the petitioner kept her in hotel and came from time to time and on 31.07.2015 had called her to his house and she was
The legality and feasibility of a petitioner's offer to keep both wives with him, in the context of bigamy and cessation of maintenance, influenced the court's decision to dismiss the petition for pr....
The court considered the conduct of the petitioner in light of the allegations and found it lacking bona fides, influencing the decision to dismiss the petition for pre-arrest bail.
Delay in lodging a complaint and inconsistencies in evidence can raise doubts about the veracity of allegations.
The court emphasized the importance of fulfilling commitments in matrimonial disputes and considered the conduct of the petitioner in reaching its decision.
The court's decision was influenced by the finding that the allegations made in the FIR were not untrue or unbelievable based on the conduct of the petitioner.
The court's decision on pre-arrest bail was based on the assessment of the facts and circumstances of the case, as well as the submissions of the parties regarding the nature of the relationship betw....
The Court's decision was influenced by the substance found in the allegations and the petitioner's conduct, leading to the dismissal of the petition for pre-arrest bail.
Compliance with court orders and the expressed desire of the opposite party in a matrimonial dispute.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
