SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Pat) 222

AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH
Saurav Kumar Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Shama Sinha, Advocate, Raj Kishore Roy, Advocate, Prerana Anand, Advocate, Vikash Kumar, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J. - The matter has been heard via video-conferencing.

2. Heard Ms. Shama Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioner; Mr. Raj Kishore Roy, learned Government Pleader 18 along with Ms. Prerana Anand, learned Assistant Counsel to Government Pleader 18 for the State/Respondent No. 1 and Mr. Vikash Kumar, learned counsel for the Bihar Real Estate Regulatory Authority (hereinafter referred to as 'RERA')/Respondent No. 2.

3. The petitioner has moved the Court for the following reliefs:

"(i) For quashing of the part of the second direction passed in operating part of the order dated 29.04.2021 (para 45) by Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Bihar (herein after authority) whereby it has decided the question of title of land (hotel in about 1 katha) of the petitioner over which the Petitioner's family had exclusive title and peaceful uninterrupted possession since the year 1970. The authority vide order dated 29.04.2021 has directed to demolish the Petitioner's hotel and to handover the possession to the developer/ builder inspite of the statement made by the builder/developer that the land belongs to the landowner and the developer cannot interfere with regard to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top