CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH, MADHURESH PRASAD
Sindhu Singh, wife of Chandra Shekhar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH, J.
1. The democratic set up of the country has been recognized as basic feature of the Constitution, like other features, namely, supremacy of Constitution, rule of law, principle of separation of powers, power of judicial review under Articles 32, 226 and 227 of the Constitution. ‘Basic’ means the basis of a thing on which it stands, on the failure of which it falls. The enunciation of law to this effect in case of Ravi Yashwant Bhoir vs. District Collector, Raigad and others reported in (2012) 4 SCC 407 is being referred at the outset in the present judgment for two basic reasons. Firstly, we are utterly dismayed over the manner in which the Principal Secretary of Urban Development and Housing Department, Govt. of Bihar (Department in short), in exercise of power under Section 25(5) of the Bihar Municipal Act, 2007 ( for short ‘the Act’) has passed an order removing the petitioner from the post of Chief Councillor, Siwan Nagar Parishad. Secondly, the order which has the effect of removal of a person, democratically elected to an office of a local body having constitutional status, is patently perverse, disclosing complete non-application of mind
Anirudhsinhji Karansinhji Jadeja v. State of Gujarat
Adi Pherozshah Gandhi v. Advocate General of Maharashtra [(1970) 2 SCC 484 : AIR 1971 SC 385]
Jasbhai Motibhai Desai v. Roshan Kumar [(1976) 1 SCC 671 : AIR 1976 SC 578]
Ghulam Qadir v. Special Tribunal [(2002) 1 SCC 33]
Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba v. Tosiba Appliances Co. [(2008) 10 SCC 766]
Maharaj Singh v. State of U.P. [(1977) 1 SCC 155 : AIR 1976 SC 2602]
Purtabpore Co. Ltd. v. Cane Commr., Bihar
Ravi Yashwant Bhoir vs. District Collector
State of Maharashtra and others vs. Prabhu reported in (1994) 2 SCC 481
State of Bihar vs. Akhil Bhartiya Jan Kalyan Sangh and others reported in 2000(1) PLJR 632
State of Punjab vs. Bhajan Singh reported in (2001) 3 SCC 565
State of Punjab vs. Baldev Singh
Tarlochan Dev Sharma vs. State of Punjab and others reported in (2001)6 SCC 260
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement of conducting a full-fledged inquiry into the charges against an elected representative of the people and the emphasis on the princ....
The judgment established the importance of recording reasons, adherence to statutory timelines, and the need for application of mind in quasi-judicial decisions, emphasizing procedural fairness and n....
Removal of elected officials under quasi-judicial provisions necessitates adherence to principles of natural justice, including fair hearing and inquiry.
The grounds for removal of an elected official must be justified under the relevant legal provisions, and removal should only be resorted to under grave and exceptional circumstances.
Removal of an elected representative requires proof of willful misconduct and adherence to principles of natural justice, not just allegations of negligence.
The removal of an elected official requires strict adherence to statutory provisions and principles of natural justice, ensuring due process in disqualification cases.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.