SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Pat) 127

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
SANDEEP KUMAR
Manjeet Chawla S/o Late Amarjeet Singh Chawla – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Mines and Geology Department, Government of Bihar, Patna – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Yashraj Singh Deora, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Sriram Krishna, Advocate, Mr. Devesh Shankar Singh, Advocate, Mr. Amarjeet, Advocate, Mr. Prabhat Kumar Singh, Advocate Mr. Shashank Shekhar Kunwar, Advocate
For the Appellant : Mr. Ajay, G.A.-5 Mr. Akash Raj, A.C. to G.A.-5
For the Mines Department :Mr. Naresh Dikshit, Spl. P.P. Mr. Brij Bihari Tiwari, Advocate Ms. Shruti Singh, Advocate Ms. Kalpana, Advocate
For the SEIAA :Mr. Kumar Ravish, Advocate
For the BSMCL :Mr. Ranjeet Kumar Pandey, Advocate
For the Private Respondent:Mr. Madhav Krishna, Advocate Mr. Suraj Samdarshi, Advocate Mr. Avinash Kumar, Advocate

Table of Content
1. auction of sand ghat with estimated annual quantity. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. overlaps with short-term permits depleted sand reserves. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
3. fresh replenishment study needed for royalty calculation. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18)
4. state must ensure accurate quantity per mining guidelines. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27)
5. bidders estopped; short-term permits legally authorized. (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39)
6. replenishment studies mandatory for sustainable sand mining. (Para 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52)
7. remand for fresh study, royalty adjustment, order quashed. (Para 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62)

JUDGMENT :

The present writ petition has been filed on behalf of the successful bidder in the auction of Bhojpur Sone 35 Ghat (65 Hectares). The central grievance of the petitioner is that the respondent State while issuing the tender notice had asserted that the aforesaid sand ghat had 11,70,000 CuM of sand available annually for sand mining, however the quantity of sand mineral, as asserted by the respondent-State, was not actuall

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top