Back
P. B. BAJANTHRI
Anay Kumar Jaiswal, S/o Shanti Ranjan Jaiswal – Appellant
Versus
Bank of India through its Chairperson – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard learned counsels for the parties.
2. In the instant petition, petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:-
A. For the issuance of appropriate writ of Mandamus or any other or appropriate writ(s) or order(s) or direction(s) commanding the Respondent Authority to accept the candidature of Petitioner under the disabilities category and confirm the appointment on the post of Clerk as he is 100% visually impaired and met the cut off marks
B. For the issuance of appropriate writ of Mandamus or any other or appropriate writ(s) or order(s) or direction(s) commanding the Respondent Authority to extend benefits of SC/STs category to the Petitioner, in compliance of order in Anmol Bhandari vs Delhi Technological University, WP(C) 4853 of 2012 which stipulates that the PWD candidates are entitled to same treatment as SC/ST candidates and thereby appoint the Petitioner on the post Clerk.
C. For the issuance of appropriate writ of Mandamus or any other or appropriate writ(s) or order(s) or direction(s) commanding the Respondent
Administrative authorities are bound by existing notifications granting relaxations for the production of mandatory recruitment documents. Denying such policy-based benefits to a candidate, thereby c....
Selected reserved category candidate qualifying written exam and producing valid category certificate at document verification cannot be denied appointment for expired certificate at application cut-....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
