Back
S. KUMAR, SANJAY KAROL
Vijeta Projects and Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SANJAY KAROL, J.
1. Petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:
2. On 21.10.2020, initially when the matter was taken up, the Court had directed that no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner.
3. On 17.03.2021, the Court had observed as under:
Contract termination invalid due to delayed, uncommunicated extension order despite genuine delay reasons; extension granted to original contractor.
The court upheld the administrative decision to terminate a contract for delay in completion due to the petitioner's failure to adhere to the agreement terms.
A contract termination must adhere to principles of natural justice, including the right to a personal hearing, and disputes regarding breaches must be adjudicated by an independent forum rather than....
The court emphasized that public authority's arbitrary termination of a contract without following due procedures violates principles of fairness and justness, meriting judicial intervention.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
