MADHURESH PRASAD, J.:–Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondents.

2. The petitioner, while posted as Probationer Sub Registrar at Thakurganj in the district of Kishanganj was served with a charge memo dated 21.03.2016. The same contained charges substance of which is as follows:—

(i) Petitioner used to come to the office late in the afternoon, usually after 3 pm with her father,

(ii) on account of her coming late to office, the State has suffered revenue loss and the distant villagers have been inconvenienced in availing the registration services in the office,

(iii) Another allegation in the charge memo is that she was not conducting spot verification before giving effect to registration of documents and

(iv) Dereliction of duty and misconduct.

3. The petitioner has been proceeded against. She has submitted a reply by way of an elaborate written statement in respect of each charge.

4. The enquiry was conducted by the Enquiry Officer who submitted his enquiry report to the Disciplinary Authority. A copy of the enquiry report is Annexure 3 to the writ petition. From bare perusal of the enquiry report, it is obvious that the proceedings, being conducted for bringing home t