SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(J&K) 95

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Gopal Krishan – Appellant
Versus
UT of J&K and others – Respondent


Table of Content
1. disciplinary proceedings initiated on unauthorized construction complaints (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. enquiry vitiated by bias and no cross-examination (Para 7 , 15)
3. fair enquiry based on records and witnesses (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
4. court hears arguments on procedural validity (Para 14 , 16 , 17)
5. eo must act independently, not as prosecutor (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22)
6. bias shown by da collecting evidence unilaterally (Para 23 , 24 , 25)
7. natural justice requires cross-examination opportunity (Para 26 , 27 , 28)
8. quash order post-superannuation, grant benefits (Para 29 , 30 , 31)

JUDGMENT :

SANJAY DHAR, J.

1. The petitioner, through the medium of present petition, has challenged order No.JMC/PS/COM/279 dated 20.05.2020 passed by respondent No. 2, whereby he has been dismissed from service. Challenge has also been thrown to the Departmental Enquiry proceedings that have been conducted by respondent No. 2 holding him guilty of the charge of misconduct.

2. As per case of the petitioner, he was appointed as Sanitary Inspector in Jammu Municipal Corporation (JMC) in the year 1991 and was promoted as Enforcement Inspector in the year 2016. Accordi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top