SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Pat) 459

CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH, KHATIM REZA
Jitu Yadav @ Jitendra Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : M/s Ramakant Sharma, Sr. Adv., Sanjay Prasad.
For the Respondent: Km. Shashi Bala Verma.

CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH, J.:–The appellant has preferred this appeal under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C. for brevity) challenging the judgment of conviction dated 08.02.2022 and the order of sentence dated 10.02.2022 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Bhagalpur, in Sessions Trial (GR) No. 131 of 2019, whereby the sole appellant has been convicted and sentenced as under:—

Convicted under Sections

Sentence

 

 

 

Imprisonment

Fine (Rs.)

In default of fine

376 of the Indian Penal Code

12 years

25,000/-

six months simple imprisonment

3(w)(v) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act

Rigorous Imprisonment for life

25,000/-

six months simple imprisonment

3(1)(w)(i) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act

Three years R.I.

5,000/-

One month simple imprisonment

2. The sentences have been ordered to run concurrently with set off under Section 428 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C. for brevity) for the cu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top