Back
SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
Md. Ataur Rahman & Ors. – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J.—These bunch of writ petitions remains certain common questions of law and were, therefore, decided to be heard together by a Coordinate Bench.
2. When the matters came up before the Court during the course of hearing on 11th July, 2022, this Court observed as under:—
“8. This Court finds that in the bunch of cases listed today and the cases which are pending before this Court following categories can be laid down for distribution or demarcating the cases :
(a) The trained teachers, who opted training after 31.03.2019.
(b) Teachers who have applied for training and have already been registered with NIOS but have not completed their training on 31.03.2019.
(c) Those who have completed their training but not received the certificate up-to 31.03.2019.
(d) Those whose results have not been declared although they have completed their training up to 31.03.2019.
(e) Teachers who have passed out from IGNOU but were unable to do the bridge course/ enrichment course of six months as required.
(f) Teachers who have completed their training but their results have been wit
The court ruled that the retrospective application of new qualification requirements for teachers violates established rights, as teachers appointed before the changes cannot be penalized under newly....
The 18 months D. El. Ed. qualification through NIOS is valid for in-service teachers employed as of 10th August 2017, contrary to the High Court's ruling.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
