SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Pat) 643

P. B. BAJANTHRI, PURNENDU SINGH
Akhileshwar Prasad – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants : Mr. Kumar Kaushik.
For the State : Mr. Saroj Kumar Sharma.

P. B. Bajanthri, J.—Heard learned counsels for the respective parties.

2. In the instant appeal, appellants have assailed the order of the learned Single Judge dated 18.02.2016 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 4501 of 2014.

3. The appellants are in the cadre of Personal Assistants and they were appointed during the intervening period from the year 1978 to 1986.

4. On 01.03.1977 holders of the post of Stenographers Grade I and Grade II had the benefit of passing certain examination. Such of those Stenographers Grade I and Grade II who have passed their examination, their services were merged with Personal Assistants with effect from 01.03.1977. The second class of persons are those who were directly recruited to the post of Personal Assistants (petitioners/appellants). Third class of persons are such of those who were initially appointed as Steno Typist were required to pass certain examination in order to have the benefit of merger with the Personal Assistants’ cadre. The Steno Typist who have not passed examination in order to have the benefit of merger with the Personal Assistants’ cadre were given upgradation on 07.08.1987. Therefore, source of recruitment to the post of Personal Assistants

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top