SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Pat) 711

P. B. BAJANTHRI, PURNENDU SINGH
Mithilesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants : M/s Jai Prakash Verma (in 1771, 1772, 1773); Abhinav Srivastava (in 1732); Mrityunjay Kumar (in 1809).
For the Respondents: M/s Chitranjan Sinha (in 1771, 1732); Sarvesh Kumar Singh (in 1772, 1773, 1809).

P. B. Bajanthri, J.—In these bunch of appeals, appellants have assailed the following orders of the learned Single Judge passed in following C.W.J.Cs:—

Sl. No.

Impugned Order

Passed in

1.

20.11.2018

C.W.J.C. No. 3582 of 2017

2.

20.11.2018

C.W.J.C. No. 4429 of 2017

3.

20.11.2018

C.W.J.C. No. 5374 of 2017

4.

20.11.2018

C.W.J.C. No. 8434 of 2017

5.

20.11.2018

C.W.J.C. No. 16773 of 2017

2. The appellants were employees of the then Bihar State Agriculture Marketing Board (for short ‘the Board’) prior to 01.09.2006. The employees of the Board were governed by C.P.F. Pension Scheme. Due to dissolution of the Board on 01.09.2006, the State Government took a policy decision to absorb such a those employees of the then Board were to be absorbed in different departments. In this regard, a decision was taken on 02.09.2008, while absorbing all such of those employees. It was made clear that their appointments were afresh and New Pension Scheme is application. In this regard, certain litigations were

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top