SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Pat) 1143

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH, J.
CWJC No. 8800 of 2020
(1.10.2021)
Rajneesh Ranjan & Ors. ... Petitioners
vs.
State of Bihar & Ors. ... Respondents

Advocates:
For the Petitioners: Mr. Mrigank Mauli, Sr. Adv., Rakesh Kumar Sharma.
For the Resp. State : M/s P.N.Sahi, Birju Prasad.
For the Intervenor : Mr. Prashant Sinha.
For the Resp. Commission : Mr. Nikesh Kumar.

Headnote:

Bihar District Ayush Medical/State Ayush Medical Service (Appointment on Regular/Contract Basis and Service Conditions) Rule, 2010 – Rule 7 – Appointment on posts of Ayurvedic Medical Officer, Unani Medical Officer, Homeopathy Medical Officer, Ayush Physician (Ayurvedic), Ayush Physician (Unani), Ayush Physician (Homeopathy) – If a statute requires something to be done in a particular manner, same has to be done in that manner alone or not at all – Stand of Principal Secretary on oath before this Court in present proceeding, on plea of proposed future amendment in statutory rules, to justify its action defies basic logic – Statutory rules framed in exercise of power under Article 309 of Constitution of India are legislative in character and bind State, Citizens and Courts alike – It was not clearly brought to notice of Division Bench in Decision dated 31.05.2021 in C.W.J.C. No. 3471 of 2021(Kumar Bhaskar and Others vs. The State of Bihar and Others) that Rule 7 of 2010 Rules has not been amended in any manner whatsoever – Matter to be placed before Chief Justice for considering whether it is a fit case for being placed before a larger Bench. (Paras 17 and 19)

Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J.—Heard Mr. Mrigank Mauli, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Mr. P.N.Sahi, learned A.A.G.-6 assisted by Mr. Birju Prasad, learned G.P.-15 and Ms. Shweta Anand, learned AC to G.P.-15, for the respondent State of Bihar. Bihar Technical Service Commission has been represented by Mr. Nikesh Kumar, learned Advocate and Mr. Prashant Sinha, learned counsel has appeared for intervenors in opposition to the writ application.

2. The petitioners claim to be holding degree of Bachelor of Homeopathic Medicine and Surgery (BHMS) from recognized institutions.

3. The Bihar Technical Service Commission (for short Commission), on the basis of a requisition sent by the Health Department, Government of Bihar, has issued a notice containing Advertisements No. 4 of 2020 to 9 of 2020 inviting applications for filling-up the posts of Ayurvedic Medical Officer, Unani Medical Officer, Homeopathy Medical Officer, Ayush Physician (Ayurvedic), Ayush Physician (Unani), Ayush Physician (Homeopathy) in the pay-scale of Rs.9300-34800 with grade pay of 5400/L-9. A total of 3270 posts have been advertised. Clause (4) of the advertisement discloses the process of selection from which it is evident that the merit list is to be prepared on the basis of the marks scored by the aspirants in their qualifying examination, namely, BAMS, BUMS, BHMS, Post Graduation (MD/MS or higher qualification) and, the points of work experience acquired by them while working on their engagement on contractual basis in recognized Government institutions/hospitals. Following is the brake-up of weightage as mentioned in the advertisement against the said three attributes :—

(i)

Weightage on the basis of score in BAMS/BUMS/BHMS

60 Marks

(ii)

Weightage on the basis of Post Graduation degree, higher qualification (MD/MS Ayurvedic, Unani and Homeopathy or higher degree)

15 Marks

(iii)

Weightage for work experience after appointment on contractual basis in Government institutions/hospitals (5 marks for each year of completion of work experience, maximum 25 marks)

25 Marks

Total

 

100 Marks

4. The petitioners have a grievance that the selection procedure laid down in the advertisement is contrary to the statutory prescription under the Bihar District Ayush Medical/State Ayush Medical Service (Appointment on Regular/Contract Basis and Service Conditions) Rule, 2010 (For short 2010 Rules). Rule 7 of the 2010 Rules reads as under :—

“7. Appointment in the State Health Ayush Cadre shall be made by the state Government on the posts of Ayush Medical Officer/Ayush Specialist grade 11. They shall be selected every year having regard to available vacancies through a competitive examination according to prescribed procedure. The selection shall be made through commission and it shall be necessary to follow the reservation rules prescribed by the State Government.”

5. With reference to Rule 7 of the Rules, the petitioners contend that it is legally impermissible for the State Government or the Commission to do away with the requirement of competitive examination as prescribed in Rule 7 of the said Rules. It is their contention that since the Rules have statutory force, the respondents cannot whittle the same down by any process and, therefore, the advertisement is unsustainable and deserves to be set aside. It is the case of the Commission that since the Commission has been constituted by the State Government of Bihar by the Bihar Act 13 of 2013 and thereafter the State Government has formulated specific rules, namely, Bihar Technical Service Commission Selection Procedure Rules, 2018, therefore, the Commission is bound to follow the rules and instructions issued by the State Government as well as the Acts and the Rules and instructions framed by the requisitioning Department for whom the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top