IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
VIPUL M. PANCHOLI and RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA, JJ.
CWJC No.8800 of 2020
(8.5.2024)
Rajneesh Ranjan & Ors. ... Petitioners
vs.
State of Bihar & Ors. ... Respondents
Bihar District Ayush Medical/State Ayush Medical Service (Appointment on Regular/Contract Basis and Service Conditions) Rules, 2010 – Rule 7 – Appointment on post of Ayush Medical Officer – Petitioners claim to be holding degree of Bachelor of Homeopathic Medicine and Surgery (B.H.M.S.) from recognized institutions – Provision for appointment through open competitive examination still remains – Merit-list is to be prepared on the basis of marks secured by candidates in their qualifying examination and points of work experience acquired by them while working on their engagement on contractual basis in recognized hospitals/institutions following which break-up of weightage has been mentioned against three attributes – It is for recruiting agency to stipulate procedure for selecting candidates – It is only when procedure is found to be patently illegal that Court would interfere – Selection procedure prescribed by recruiting agency while issuing impugned advertisement cannot be termed as arbitrary or in violation of Article 14 of Constitution of India – Rules as exist as on today do not provide for competitive examination, as provided by Rule 7 of 2010 Rules which stands deleted in June, 2021 – It would be a futile exercise to set aside advertisement and to give direction to respondent authority to issue fresh advertisement as per Rules existing as on date – Petition dismissed. (Paras 5.4, 16, 30, 32, 39.1, 40 and 41)
Vipul M. Pancholi, J. – The present petition has been placed before us pursuant to the order dated 01.10.2021 passed by the learned Single Judge, whereby the learned Single Judge has referred the matter to the Hon’ble The Chief Justice for placing this matter before a larger Bench. Hon’ble The Chief Justice, therefore, directed the office to place this petition before the present Division Bench.
2. The petitioners have preferred the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India in which they have prayed for the following relief/s: –
| (i) | Weightage on the basis of score in BAMS/BUMS/BHMS | 60 Marks |
| (ii) | Weightage on the basis of Post Graduation degree, higher qualification (MD/MS Ayurvedic, Unani and Homeopathy or higher degree) | 15 Marks |
| (iii) | Weightage for work experience after appointment on contractual basis in Government institutions/hospitals (5 marks for each year of completion of work experience, maximum 25 marks) | 25 Marks |
|
| Total | 100 Marks |
3. The factual matrix of the present case is as under: –
3.1. Petitioners claim to be holding the degree of Bachelor of Homeopathic Medicine and Surgery (B.H.M.S.) from recognized institutions.
3.2. The Bihar Technical Service Commission (for the sake of convenience hereinafter referred to as Commission), on the basis of the requisition sent by the Health Department, Government of Bihar, has issued a notice containing advertisement Nos. 4 of 2020 to 9 of 2020 inviting applications for filling up the posts of Ayurvedic Medical Officer, Unani Medical Officer, Homeopathic Medical Officer, Ayush Physician (Ayurvedic), Ayush Physician (Unani), Ayush Physician (Homeopathy) in the pay-scale of Rs.9300-34800 with gradepay of Rs. 5400/L-9. A total of 3270 posts have been advertised.
3.3. Clause-4 of the advertisement provides the process of selection from which it is revealed that the merit-list is to be prepared on the basis of the marks secured by the candidates in their qualifying examination, i.e. B.A.M.S., B.U.M.S., B.H.M.S., Post Graduation (M.D./M.S. or Higher Education) and the points of work experience acquired by them while working on their engagement on contractual basis in recognized Government Hospitals/Institutions. Following is the break-up of weightage as mentioned in the advertisement against the 3 attributes: –
(i) Weightage on the basis of score in BAMS/BUMS/BHMS 60 Marks
(ii) Weightage on the basis of Post Graduation degree, higher qualification (MD/MS Ayurvedic, Unani and Homeopathy or higher degree) 15 Marks
(iii) Weightage for work experience after appointment on contractual basis in Government institutions/hospitals (5 marks for each year of completion of work experience, maximum 25 marks)
25 Marks
Total 100 Marks
3.4. The petitioners have, therefore, preferred the present petition challenging the aforesaid advertisement and the process of selection disclosed by the respondent authorities in the aforesaid advertisement.
4. Heard Mr. Mrigank Mauli, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners assisted by Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sharma, Mr. Sanket, Mr. Alok Anand and Mr. Navin Kumar Singh, Mr. Birju Prasad, G.P. 13 for the respondent State assisted by Mrs. Shweta Anand and Mr. Ravi Kumar, Mr. Nikesh Kumar, learned counsel for the respondent Commission, Mr. Prashant Sinha, learned counsel for intervenor respondent Nos. 5 to 11 assisted by Mr. Rishi Raj Ranjan and Mr. Kunal, Mr. Chakrapani, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 13 and 14 assisted by Mr. Madhuresh Singh and Mr. Dipak Kumar.
Submissions on behalf of the petitioners
5. Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners has mainly raised the following contentions-
5.1. Learned Senior Counsel has referred Bihar District Ayush Medical/State Ayush Medical Service (Appointment on Regular/Contract Basis and Service Conditions) Rules, 2010 (hereinafter referred to as 2010 Rules).
Dr. Shah Faesal vs. Union of India
Secretary, A.P. Public Service Commission vs. B. Swapna
Assam Public Service Commission vs. Pranjal Kumar Sarma
Municipal Council, Palai vs. T.J. Joseph
Yogendra Pal Singh vs. Union of India
Dr. Dharmbir Kumar vs. State of Bihar through Chief Secretary, Bihar, Patna
The impugned advertisement is legal, fair and in consonance with the 2021 Rules. The Petitioners cannot be granted any relief by way of a Writ and the present Writ Petitions are liable to be dismisse....
(1) Appointment – Even if relevant rules permit competent authority to set benchmarks at different stages of recruitment process, same must be done at any time before relevant stage is reached.(2) Ap....
Amended Rules of 1962 mandate that interview marks in public examinations cannot exceed 10% of total marks to ensure fair and transparent selection processes, reaffirming principles of constitutional....
Point of Law : Selecting body does not have its right to alter the procedure for selection than what is prescribed under the relevant Service Rules, 2014 and Recruitment Rules, 2017.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.