VIPUL M. PANCHOLI, RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA
Rajneesh Ranjan – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
Vipul M. Pancholi, J. – The present petition has been placed before us pursuant to the order dated 01.10.2021 passed by the learned Single Judge, whereby the learned Single Judge has referred the matter to the Hon’ble The Chief Justice for placing this matter before a larger Bench. Hon’ble The Chief Justice, therefore, directed the office to place this petition before the present Division Bench.
2. The petitioners have preferred the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India in which they have prayed for the following relief/s: –
| (i) | Weightage on the basis of score in BAMS/BUMS/BHMS | 60 Marks |
| (ii) | Weightage on the basis of Post Graduation degree, higher qualification (MD/MS Ayurvedic, Unani and Homeopathy or higher degree) | 15 Marks |
| (iii) | Weightage for work experience after appointment on contractual basis in Government institutions/hospitals (5 marks for each year of completion of work experience, maximum 25 marks) | 25 Marks |
|
| Total | 100 Marks |
3. The factual matrix of the present case is as under: –
3.1. Petitioners cl
Dr. Shah Faesal vs. Union of India
Secretary, A.P. Public Service Commission vs. B. Swapna
Assam Public Service Commission vs. Pranjal Kumar Sarma
Municipal Council, Palai vs. T.J. Joseph
Yogendra Pal Singh vs. Union of India
Dr. Dharmbir Kumar vs. State of Bihar through Chief Secretary, Bihar, Patna
The impugned advertisement is legal, fair and in consonance with the 2021 Rules. The Petitioners cannot be granted any relief by way of a Writ and the present Writ Petitions are liable to be dismisse....
(1) Appointment – Even if relevant rules permit competent authority to set benchmarks at different stages of recruitment process, same must be done at any time before relevant stage is reached.(2) Ap....
Amended Rules of 1962 mandate that interview marks in public examinations cannot exceed 10% of total marks to ensure fair and transparent selection processes, reaffirming principles of constitutional....
Point of Law : Selecting body does not have its right to alter the procedure for selection than what is prescribed under the relevant Service Rules, 2014 and Recruitment Rules, 2017.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.