SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Pat) 901

ASHUTOSH KUMAR and NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY, JJ.
LPA No. 39, 13 of 2022 in CWJC No.2310 of 2020
(20.12.2022)
Ravi Kumar Singh & Ors. (in 39)
State of Bihar & Ors. (in 13)
vs.
State of Bihar & Ors. (in 39)
Ram Babu Azad & Ors. (in 13) ... Petitioners

Advocates:
For the Appellants : M/s Y.V. Giri, Sr. Adv., Pranav Kumar, Ms. Shrishti Singh (in 39); M/s Manish Dhari Singh (A.C. To A.G.), Dinu Kumar (in 13).
For the Respondents: Mr.Md. Khurshid Alam (Aag12) (in 39); Ms. Ritika Rani (in 13).

Headnote:

Bihar Amin Cadre Rules, 2013 with 2016 and 2017 Amendments – Rule 6 – Appointment of Amins – qualifications – by the Amendment Acts/Rules of 2016 and 2017, only the qualification was lowered by excluding the compulsory requirement of having a degree of Amanant from a recognized Government Institutes or having successfully completed survey course from ITI – With the bench mark having been lowered, the consideration zone expanded, which in any way included the respondents, but they chose not to participate in the selection process – publishing of Amendment Acts/ Rules in the official gazette further signify that 2013 Rules (unamended) were not published in the official gazette only because of indeference and nothing else – the Hon’ble Single Judge, while evaluating the correctness of advertisement in terms of unamended 2013 Rules, found it to be defective and set aside the entire process, but without taking into account the later developments, namely, the Amendments in the 2013 Rules in the year 2016 and 2017 respectively which permitted lowering of the academic qualification in the advertisement – even otherwise, when the Hon'ble Single judge was aware that the entire process had been completed and may persons were found to be successful, such an order ought to have been only after noticing them as a right had occured in such process – however, the most of the posts of Amins in the State of Bihar being vacant, the impugned judgement is unsustainable and set aside – consequently, the revival of the process of selection from the stage from where it was stopped will follow – Appeals allowed. (Paras 51 to 57)

1194 (2) SCC 630, 1996 SCC 493 (State of Bihar – Vrs. Ramdeo Yadav, 2011 (9) SCC 645, 1998 (4) SCC 114, 1998 (4) SCC 65, 1987 (1) SCC 658, 2000 (9) SCC 461 – Referred.

Ashutosh Kumar, J. – L.P.A. No. 39 of 2022 (Ravi Kumar Singh vs. the State of Bihar) and L.P.A. No. 13 of 2022 (Ram Babu Azad vs. the State of Bihar) have been taken up together and are being disposed of by this common Judgment.

2. The appellants in L.P.A. No. 39 of 2022 and the State in L.P.A No. 13 of 2022 have challenged the judgment and order dated 07.12.2021, passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 2310/2020, wherein, the Advertisement (Vivran Pustika) issued by the Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Govt. of Bihar dated 21.12.2019 for appointment on 1767 posts of Amins has been cancelled / set aside, reserving the liberty to the State to notify the posts in terms of Bihar Amin Cadre Rules, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as 2013 Rules) within a period of three months from the passing of the order.

3. The aforesaid order was passed by the learned Single Judge on finding that the qualification fixed in the Advertisement was not in terms of Rule 6 of 2013 Rules. The learned Single Judge, it has been urged, did not take into account that the qualification required for appointment of Amins was lowered by the amendments in the 2013 Rules in the year 2016 and 2017.

4. In order to appreciate the contention of the parties, it would be appropriate to refer to the provisions of appointment contained in the amended 2013 Rules. Rule 6 of the unamended 2013 Rules provides that the direct appointment to the post of Amins shall be made on the basis of the recommendation obtained from the Bihar Staf Selection Commission through competitive examination conducted for the post of Amins. Sub-clause-(II) of Rule 6 further specifies that separate requisition of the District Sub-Cadre, Directorate of Consolidation Sub-Cadre and Directorate of Land Records and Survey Sub-Cadre shall be sent to the Commission. Sub-clause (III) further indicates that it would be essential for the candidates to have certificate of Intermediate (10+2) or equivalent qualification from a recognized Board or equivalent Institutions and degree of Amanat from a Govt. recognized Institute or success in the training of Surveyor from I.T.I. (Emphasis provided by us)

5. Out of sheer necessity, it would also be relevant to refer to Rule -7 of 2013 Rules, which provides for the written syllabus for the competitive examination. For appointment to the post of Amins, the Rules prescribe that there shall be a competitive examination to be conducted by the Staf Selection Commission consisting of two papers with full marks of 100, viz. General Knowledge, Current Events, General Science for 50 marks and General Hindi for 50 marks in first paper and General Mathematics for 50 marks of matric level and 50 marks for Amanat related questions in the second paper.

6. The afore-noted 2013 Rules were amended in 2016 and 2017 as noted above.

7. The 2016 amendment to the Rules came on 15.06.2016 which substituted Sub-clause-(III) of Rule 6 of the 2013 Rules, specifying that for appointment to the post of Amin, the candidate must have passed the Intermediate (10+2) or any other equivalent examination from any recognized Board/equivalent Institution and marks will also be given for experience of Amanat obtained for the services in the State Govt. The maximum marks for experience would be 25 and five marks for each year would be allocated. The calculation of experience would be made as per the calendar year and more than six months of experience would be counted as one year and less than six months experience would be counted as zero year.

8. Rule 7 of 2013 Rules was also amended.

9. The syllabus now, according to the 2016 amendment, would comprise competitive examination of 75 marks to be held by the Commission for appointment to the posts of Amin. There would be one question paper in which, there shall be three parts ; part-I consisting of General Knowledge, Current Afairs, General Science and General Hindi of 25 marks; part -II of General Maths of 25 marks ; and part -II

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top