SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Pat) 1140

ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY
Roushan Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioners: Mr. Y.V. Giri, Sr. Adv., Alok Ranjan.
For the BPSC : M/s Lalit Kishore, Sr. Adv., Sanjay Pandey, Nishant Kumar Jha.

Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J.—Eight petitioners have filed the present writ application on the basis of the following foundational facts:—

“4. That in order to appreciate the issues involved in the instant writ petition it is stated that BPSC has published an advertisement bearing advertisement no. 02/2017, for appointment to the post of Assistant Engineer (Civil), advertisement no. 03/2017 for appointment to the post of Assistant Engineer (Engineering) and advertisement no. 04/2017 for appointment on the post of Assistant Engineer (Civil Animal Fisheries, Department) in various departments of the Government of Bihar and accordingly forms were invited from the eligible candidates.

Pursuant to and compliance to the same the petitioners alongwith other candidates have filled up the forms and have submitted to the BPSC and the same was duly received in the office of BPSC, last date of submission of form was fixed for 12.4.2017.

5. That it is pertinent to mention here that some of the candidates who have had some grievances with regard to minimum age fixed have approached to the Hon’ble Court, Patna by way of filing of writ application bearing CWJC No 5799 of 2017 which was allowed by the Hon’b

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top