IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
HARISH KUMAR
Sudhir Kumar Gupta S/o Rajkumar Gupta – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. emphasis on 'right to know' in public examination processes. (Para 1 , 12) |
| 2. challenge to the selection process. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 3. arguments about selection irregularities. (Para 5 , 6 , 10) |
| 4. right to information and transparency. (Para 7 , 9) |
| 5. validity of cut-off mark changes. (Para 8 , 18 , 30) |
| 6. legal principles on challenging examination results. (Para 21 , 22 , 24) |
| 7. affirmation of proper selection process. (Para 26 , 27 , 33) |
| 8. final ruling on petitions based on merit list findings. (Para 28) |
| 9. final ruling of the court. (Para 34 , 35 , 36) |
JUDGMENT :
HARISH KUMAR, J.
The Cluster of the petitioners in both the cases are represented through Mr. Dinu Kumar, learned Advocate for the petitioners with M/s Ritika Rani, learned Advocate. The Bihar Police Sub-ordinate Service Commission is represented through Mr. P. K. Shahi, learned Senior Advocate. Mr. Sheo Shankar Prasad, learned SC-8 appears on behalf of the State.
2. The entire selection process as well as appointment of the selected candidates against Advertisement No. 1/2019 is put to challenge in the premise of the same being suffered from the vice of serious irregularities. The petitioners sought a directio
Secretary General, Supreme Court of India Vs. Subhash Chandra Agarwal
Central Board of Sec. Education & Anr. vs Aditya Bandopadhyay & Ors
Kanpur University and Others Vs. Samir Gupta and Others
Tej Prakash Pathak and Others Vs. Rajasthan High Court and Others
Bedanga Talukdar vs Saifudaullah Khan & Ors.
State of Bihar & Ors vs Mithilesh Kumar
Amrit Yadav Vs. State of Jharkhand
Bihar Police Subordinate Service Commission Vs. Ramesh Kumar & Ors.
Chandra Prakash Tiwari and Ors vs Shakuntala Shukla and Ors.
Union of India & Others vs S. Vinodh Kumar & Others
Amlan Jyoti Borooah vs State of Assam & Ors
Manish Kumar Shahi vs. State of Bihar & Ors.
Madan Lal and Ors. Vs. State of Jammu & Kashmir and Ors.
The selection process for recruitment must comply strictly with the criteria published in the advertisement; changes are impermissible unless explicitly allowed.
The recruitment process must adhere strictly to stipulations in the advertisement, and a candidate cannot contest procedures post-participation without valid grievances if unsuccessful.
Employment and Service matter - Grade-IV employees - Selection process - Selection process is not subject matter of challenge in absence of any grounds, subsequent action of issuing appointment order....
A candidate who participates in a selection process without objection cannot subsequently challenge the process if the result is not to their liking.
Point of Law : candidates cannot approbate and reprobate at the same time. Either the candidates should not have participated in the interview and challenged the procedure or they should have challen....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.