IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
SHAILENDRA SINGH, J.
Awadhesh Kumar Jha @ Awadhesh Jha, S/o-Kapildeo Jha – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Bihar - Respondent
Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.1542 of 2018
Decided on : 06-02-2023
Acid Attack - Criminal Law - Indian Penal Code (IPC) Sections 307, 326, 324, 447, 341 - The court discussed the prosecution's case, evidence of witnesses, medical reports, and upheld the conviction of the appellant for the mentioned offences. The court reduced the sentence of rigorous imprisonment from ten years to the period already undergone by the appellant, but upheld the fine of Rs. 50,000.
Fact of the Case:
The appellant was convicted for pouring acid on the victims' bodies. The prosecution's case was supported by eyewitnesses, medical evidence, and material witnesses. The appellant claimed innocence and false implication due to enmity.
Finding of the Court:
The court found the prosecution's evidence credible and upheld the appellant's conviction for the mentioned offences. The court reduced the sentence of rigorous imprisonment but upheld the fine.
Issues: The main issue was whether the prosecution proved the allegation of acid attack on the victims by the appellant.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the credible testimony of eyewitnesses, medical evidence, and material witnesses to uphold the appellant's conviction.
Final Decision: The appeal was dismissed, and the sentence of rigorous imprisonment was reduced to the period already undergone by the appellant. The fine of Rs. 50,000 was upheld.
JUDGMENT :
The instant criminal appeal has been filed by the appellant/convict namely Awadhesh Kumar Jha @ Awadhesh Jha against the judgment impugned dated 12.04.2018 convicting the appellant and order dated 12.04.2018 sentencing the appellant by the Court of 1st Additional District and Sessions Judge, Sheohar in Sessions Trial No. 597/2010.
2. By the impugned judgment the appellant has been convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 307, 326, 324, 447 and 341 of the Indian Penal Code (in short I.P.C.) and he has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for ten years under Section 307 of I.P.C., further ten years of rigorous imprisonment under Section 326 of I.P.C. with a fine of Rs. 50,000/-, rigorous imprisonment for three years under Section 324 of I.P.C., rigorous imprisonment for three months under Section 447 of I.P.C. and simple imprisonment for one month under Section 341 of I.P.C. and all these sentences of imprisonment have been directed by convicting trial Court to run concurrently. The trial Court directed that the appellant will have to undergo simple imprisonment for two months in the event of default in payment of fine.
3. It is here relevant to mention that the co-accused namely Ram Bali Sahani, did not appear before the trial Court hence he was declared absconder and trial of the appellant was taken up and he was convicted for the above-mentioned offences and the instant appeal is in respect of one accused namely Awadhesh Kumar Jha @ Awadhesh Jha, who has been convicted and sentenced.
4. The substance of the prosecution's case is as follows :
As per the Fardbeyan of the informant, on 15.04.2010 she was asleep with her family members and in the night at about 1:30 – 2:00 A.M. her daughter aged 9 years went outside of her house with her after opening the door of her house in order to attend a call of nature and after relieving, she and her daughter came into the courtyard of their house and sat there for a while, as at that time there was scorching heat and then the accused persons namely Awadhesh Kumar Jha @ Awadhesh Jha and Ram Bali Sahani and three other suddenly entered into the courtyard of their house and at that time the accused/convict Awadhesh Kumar Jha @ Awadhesh Jha was having a bottle in his hand and all the accused persons started abusing her husband which was objected by her then the accused Awadhesh Kumar Jha @ Awadhesh Jha opened the said bottle and poured it over her and thereafter co-accused Ram Bali Sahani took out a bottle from his pocket and poured the same over the body of her daughter and then she and her daughter started screaming on account of burning of their body and after that her husband came out and then the accused persons snatched anklet (payal) from her daughter's leg and thereafter her co-villagers gathered on hearing halla (noise) and after that her husband took her and her daughter to S.K.M.C.H (medical College), Muzaffarpur for medical treatment.
5. On the basis of above-mentioned Fardbeyan of the informant, Tariyani P.S.Case No. 56/2010 was registered under Sections 307, 324, 379, 447 and 341 of I.P.C. which set the criminal law in motion and the investigation was started and after that investigation the chargesheet was submitted and cognizance of the alleged offences was taken by the concerned Judicial Magistrate and thereafter the matter was committed to the Court of Sessions for trial.
6. The appellant was charged for the offences punishable under Sections 307/34, 326/34, 324/34, 341/34, 447/34, 379/34 and 504/34 and the said charge of different heads was explained to him by the trial Court to which the appellant pleaded not guilty and claimed for trial.
7. During the trial, the prosecution produced the following ten witnesses and examined them as under :-
P.W. 2 – Ram Dulari Devi (Hearsay witness/Mother-in-law of the informant)
P.W. 3 – Tejan Sah (eye-witness/father-in-law of the informant)
P.W. 4 – Bilash Ram (Hearsay w
Acid attack conviction under IPC §§304, 326A upheld on eyewitness testimony despite FIR delay and minor discrepancies; life sentence reduced to 14 years fixed term balancing retribution, time served,....
In a case resting on circumstantial evidence, the circumstances must be fully established and consistent only with the hypothesis of the guilt of the accused. Suspicion, howsoever high, cannot take t....
Acid attack – Acid attacks not only cause damage to physical appearance of its victims but also cause immense psychological trauma – Delay in filing FIR alone cannot refute entire prosecution story.
Acid Attack - Eye witnesses - Admissibility of - As a consequence of fact that injuries to the witness is an inbuilt guarantee of his presence at scene of crime and because the witness would not want....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the reliance on convincing and trustworthy oral and medical evidence to affirm the conviction and sentence of the appellant for the offence of acid....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the reliance on testimonies, medical evidence, and the appellant's history of harassment to establish guilt and determine the appropriate sentence.
The prosecution must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, and inconsistencies in victim testimonies can lead to acquittal in serious crimes.
Acid attack conviction under IPC 326A upheld via hostile victim's reliable cross-examination and unexplained nitrate residues on accused's clothes; POCSO quashed lacking sexual intent.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.