RAJIV ROY
Anil Sao, Son of Late Ramchandra Sao – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent
ORDER :
Heard Mr. S.K. Lal, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the informant as also Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, learned APP for the State.
2. This application has been preferred for quashing of the order dated 25.07.2014 passed by the Court of Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge -IVth, Jehanabad in Cr. Rev. No. 16 of 2001 by which the criminal revision application was dismissed as time barred.
3. The prosecution story is/are as follows :-
(ii) initially, Pandit Jadunandan Sharma, the great grand-father of Opposite Party No. 2 was looking after the same. However, with the passage of time, his ancestor became dishonest, shifted the ‘deity’ to some other place and after the death of Jadunandan Sharma, his son, Krishnadeo Sharma started managing the affairs. Krishnadeo Sharma is the father of Opposite
Krishnan and Anr. Vs. Krishnaveni & Another reported in (1997) 4 SCC 241
Surya Baksh Singh Vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh reported in (2014) 14 SCC 222
Sabo Devi & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar & Anr. reported in 2015(3) PLJR 837
The State of Bihar & Others Vs. Dayanand Jha reported in 2008 (4) BBCJ 252
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.