VAIBHAVI D. NANAVATI
BIPINCHANDRA NATWARLAL MISTRY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
ORDER :
1. By way of this writ-application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 the writ-applicant herein has prayed for the following reliefs:
(B) YOUR LORDSHIPS be pleased to issue appropriate writ, order or direction, quashing and setting aside the impugned order dated 29.4.2017 passed by Ld. Additional Sessions Judge, Surat in Criminal Misc. Application (for delay condonation) No. 1959 of 2017 as well as order dated 3.11.2014 passed by the Ld. JMFC, Olpad in Private Criminal Inquiry Case No. 16 of 2014 and further be pleased to direct registration of FIR/complaint against the respondent nos. 2 to 7 for the offences punishable u/s. 323, 406, 420, 447, 464, 465, 467, 468, 470, 471, 474, 395, 506(2) of IPC, in the interest of justice.
In the alternative
(BB) YOUR LORDSHIPS be pleased to issue appropriate writ, order or direction, quashing and setting aside the impugned order dated 29.4.2017 passed by Ld. Additional Sessions Judge, Surat in Criminal Misc. Application (for delay condonation) No. 1959 of 2017 and further be please
Gohil Vishvaraj Hanubhai vs. State of Gujarat
Khalil Ahmed Bashir Ahmed vs. Tufelhussein Samsabhai Sarangpurwala
M/s Beopar Sahyak (P) Ltd. and Others vs. Shri Vishwa Math and Others
Satyanarayan Laxminarayan Hegde and Others vs. Mallikarjun Bhavanappa Tirumale
State of Andhra Pradesh vs. P.V. Hanumantha Rao (D) LRs. AIR 2004 SC 627
Venkatlal G. Pittie and Another vs. M/s Bright Bros. Pvt. Ltd. (1987) 2 Scale 115
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.