SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Pat) 100

ANSHUMAN
Jaganarayan Singh @ Jag Narayan Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Parijat Saurav.
For the Respondent: Mr. Rajendra Prasad Nat, APP.

Dr. Anshuman, J. – Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

2. The present criminal revision application has been filed for setting aside the judgment dated 21.11.2022 passed by Additional District & Sessions Judge-III, Buxar in Cr. Appeal No. 90 of 2019 and also the judgment and conviction of sentence dated 03.10.2019 passed by Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate-VI, Buxar in G.R. Case No. 2004 of 2010 (Brahmpur P.S. Case No. 319 of 2010) whereby petitioner was convicted under Sections 323 and 325 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to simple imprisonment of 4 months under Section 323 of the Indian Penal Code and simple imprisonment of 2 years under Section 325 of the Indian Penal Code along with fine of Rs.2000/- and in default of payment of fine, the petitioner shall undergo imprisonment of 1 month and both sentences shall run concurrently.

3. Counsel submits that after trial, Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate-VI, Buxar has convicted the petitioner under Sections 323 and 325 of the Indian Penal Code whereas he has been exonerated from Section 379 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

4. Counsel further submits that originally there were two accused person

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top