SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Pat) 222

CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH, RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
Boby Devi – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant : None.
For the Respondent: Ms S.B.Verma, APP., Pratik Mishra, learned Amicus Curiae.

Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J. – This appeal has been preferred by the appellants under Section 374(2), putting to challenge the impugned judgment of conviction and order dated 28.05.2015 passed by learned Additional District and Sessions Judge-IV, Danapur, in Sessions Trial No. 1020 of 2013, arising out of Bihta P.S. Case No. 04 of 2013, whereby the appellants have been convicted and sentenced as under: –

CRIMINAL APPEAL (DB) No. 698 of 2015

Binda Devi

302/34 of the IPC

Imprisonment for life    

5,000/-

SI for two months

Boby Devi

302/34 of the IPC

Imprisonment for life

5,000/-

SI for two months

2. We must, at the outset, point out that when this appeal was called for final hearing on various dates, there was no representation on behalf of the appellants. Accordingly, by an order dated 14.11.2022, the Court had appointed Mr Pratik Mishra, learned Advocate of this Court from the panel of lawyers prepared by Patna High Court Legal Services Committee, for providing legal aid, to assist this Court and place the case of the appellants before this Court. Mr Mishra ha

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top