SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Pat) 298

CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH, RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
Pramod Rai – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants : M/s Vikram Deo Singh, Sanjay Kumar(in 628); Harsh Singh, Tej Pratap Singh (in 648).
For the Respondent: Mr.Abhimanyu Sharma, APP (in 628); Sujit Kumar Singh, APP (in 648).

Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J.—The appellants have preferred this appeal under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the judgment of conviction dated 29.05.2015 and the order of sentence dated 09.06.2015 passed by the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Sitamarhi in Sessions Trial No. 377 of 2007/518/13 arising out of Sonbarsa P.S. Case No. 56 of 1994, whereby and whereunder the appellants have been convicted and sentenced as under:—

Appellant Pramod Rai in Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 628 of 2015

Conviction under Section

Imprisonment

Sentence Fine (Rs.)

In default of fine

Under Section 302/34 of the IPC

Imprisonment for life

Rs. 25,000/-

RI for Seven months

Section 3/4 of the Explosive Substances Act

Rigorous Imprisonment for 10 years

Rs. 10,000/-

RI for Six months

Appellant No. 1 Chandeshwar Rai in Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 648 of 2015

Conviction under Section

Imprisonment

Sentence Fine (Rs.)

In default of fine

Under Section 302/34 of the IPC

Imprisonment for life

Rs. 25,000/-

RI for Five months

Appellant No. 2 Ume

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top