Anil Kumar vs State of Bihar - 2023 Supreme(Pat) 342

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(Pat) 342

CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH, CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH
Anil Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants : M/s Ajay Kumar Thakur, Ritwaj Raman, Md. Imteyaz Ahmad, Ritwik Thakur, Vaishanavi Singh.
For the Resp. State : Ms. Shashi Bala Verma, APP.
For the Informant : M/s Alka Verma, Mira Kumari.

Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J.—These appeals, preferred under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, arise out of the same judgment of conviction dated 06.03.2020 and order of sentence dated 17.03.2020 passed by learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge (POCSO Act and SC/ST Act), Sitamarhi, in G.R. No. 2454/19, Trial No. 90/19 arising out of Sitamarhi Mahila P.S. Case No. 27/19, and, therefore, these appeals have been heard together and are being disposed of by the present common impugned judgment and order.

2. By the impugned judgment and order, the appellants have been convicted and sentenced as under:—

	Cr. Appeal (D.B.) No. 417 of 2020
	Convicted under Sections	Imprisonment	Sentence Fine (Rs.)	In default of fine
Appellant No. 1 (Anil Kumar)	376 DA of the Indian Penal Code	Life (for remainder of his natural life)	25,000/-	–
	354-A, 354-B and 506 of the Indian Penal Code	–	–	–
	6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012	–	–	–
	Section 67-B of the Information Technolog

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2023 Supreme(Pat) 342

CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH, CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGHAnil Kumar – AppellantVersusState of Bihar – Respondent

Cases Referred (4)

CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH, CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH
Anil Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent