SATYAVRAT VERMA
Vinay Thakur – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
Satyavrat Verma, J. – Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the present application has been filed seeking quashing of the order dated 21.01.2015 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, West Champaran at Bettiah in Cr. Revision No. 238 of 2014 arising out of Complaint Case No. 1121-C of 2010, whereby the learned Sessions Judge dismissed the revision application filed by the petitioners against the order dated 26.06.2014 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Bettiah in Trial No. 2115 of 2014 arising out of Complaint Case No. 1121-C of 2010.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the complainant has filed Complaint Case No. 1121-C of 2010 against the petitioners in which cognizance was taken under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code by the learned Magistrate. Thereafter, the petitioners were taken into custody and after their release they filed an application dated 03.01.2014 under Section 245 of the Cr.P.C. and the same came to be rejected by order dated 26.06.2014 against which the petitioners preferred the instant Cr. Revision No. 238 of 2014 before the learned Sessi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.