SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Pat) 710

SATYAVRAT VERMA
Vinay Thakur – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Rakesh Kumar No.1.
For the Opp. Party : Mr. Shailendra Kumar No.1, APP.

Satyavrat Verma, J. – Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the present application has been filed seeking quashing of the order dated 21.01.2015 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, West Champaran at Bettiah in Cr. Revision No. 238 of 2014 arising out of Complaint Case No. 1121-C of 2010, whereby the learned Sessions Judge dismissed the revision application filed by the petitioners against the order dated 26.06.2014 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Bettiah in Trial No. 2115 of 2014 arising out of Complaint Case No. 1121-C of 2010.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the complainant has filed Complaint Case No. 1121-C of 2010 against the petitioners in which cognizance was taken under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code by the learned Magistrate. Thereafter, the petitioners were taken into custody and after their release they filed an application dated 03.01.2014 under Section 245 of the Cr.P.C. and the same came to be rejected by order dated 26.06.2014 against which the petitioners preferred the instant Cr. Revision No. 238 of 2014 before the learned Sessi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top