MOHIT KUMAR SHAH
Rakesh Gupta S/o Late Ramagya Prasad Gupta – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
MOHIT KUMAR SHAH, J.
1. The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the letter dated 24.05.2019 issued by the District Sub-Registrar, Saran at Chapra whereby and where-under he has refused to register the sale deed presented by the petitioner on the pretext that the same is not covered by the order dated 19.04.2019 passed in CWJC No. 2524 of 2018. The petitioner has further put a challenge to the proceedings of the workshop held on 03.06.2017, as contained in Memo dated 7.6.2017, which has been circulated by the Deputy Inspector General of Registration, Bihar, Patna vide his letter dated 20.07.2017, amongst all the Collector-cum-District Magistrate/All District Sub-Registrar/All Sub-Registrar, with a direction to comply with the directions contained in Paragraph Nos. 2(Gha) and 3(Kha), which pertain to ban on sale/ purchase of Topo land and non-registration of such land, apart from ensuring compliance of other directions mentioned therein. Lastly, it has been prayed to direct the respondent authorities, more particularly the Respondent no. 5 i.e. the Sub-Registrar, Saran at Chapra to register the sale deed presented for registration on 22.5.2019.
2. The brief f
Bihar Deed Writers Association and Others vs. State of Bihar and Others
Haradas Acharjya Choudhuri and Others vs. Secretary of State for India and Others
Tarakdas Acharjee Choudhury and Others vs. Secretary of State and Others
The main legal point established in the judgment is the duty of the registering authority to register a document complying with statutory requirements and the lack of legal force of workshop guidelin....
The Sub-Registrar's powers to refuse registration are limited to specific grounds outlined in the Registration Act, and any refusal based on arbitrary reasons or external pressures is unlawful.
The Sub-Registrar must independently decide on the registrability of a deed without needing clarification from the District Registrar, as their investigation into title is not permissible under law.
The impugned circular and Rule 44(1)(i) were found to be contrary to sections 34 and 35 of the Registration act, 1908 and beyond the legislative competence of the respondents.
The Sub-Registrar's duty is to verify the identity of the executant and their admission of execution, not to ascertain the title of the property being sold.
The registering authority must register a deed if all legal requirements are met, regardless of third-party objections regarding title, reaffirming the administrative role of the registration process....
The Sub Registrar cannot refuse registration of a document solely due to title disputes unless it is proven the vendor has no title over the property in question.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.