N. SATHISH KUMAR
Subramani – Appellant
Versus
Sub-Registrar – Respondent
ORDER :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR
Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned proceedings dated 05.04.2024 made in RFL/Rasipuram/104/2024 issued by the respondent quash the same and consequently direct the respondent to register the sale deed dated 05.04.2024 presented by the petitioner.
Every day there will be number of cases listed in the admission motion relating to challenge of refusal slip issued by the Sub-Registrar for one reason or other mainly based on the circular issued by the Inspector General of Registration.
2. Despite the law declared by this Court in various cases, it is brought to the notice of this Court whenever the judgment of this Court brought to the notice of the Sub Registrars, routine answers given by them were that above judgment apply only to facts of the particular case. Therefore, they are not bound by the judgment. Ignoring the said settled principle of law, slips were regularly issued by the authorities. Thus, this Court is of the view that in order to effective implementation of the Court orders and also
Assistant Commissioner (CT) v. I. O. B. (Mad)[FB]
K. Balachandran v A.M Muthyyan Mudaliar (1974) 87 LW 812
K.S. Vijayendran v. The Inspector General of Registration (2011) 2 LW 648
M. Marathachalam Pillai v. Padmavathi Ammal (1971) 3 SCC 878
Park View Enterprises v Government of Tamil Nadu
Park View Enterprises v. State of T.N.
Reconstruction Co. (India) Ltd. v. S.P. Velayutham
Sathiyamoorthy v Sub-Registrar (2023) 4 CTC 287
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.